|
Post by annetter on Mar 7, 2019 8:10:15 GMT -5
totally agree. Also, I think that if there was a different ending - reuniting Keller with his daughter- , Hugh would have been nominated (and won) that illusive Oscar.
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Mar 30, 2019 19:18:22 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Mar 30, 2019 20:06:52 GMT -5
I wish I could respond to the above article and its author ( the page did not have a place for comments, as far as I can see). Actually it is only an online blog from Canada... not really an official review.
*He is probably a fan of Denis Villeneuve...and writes that DV has won many Academy Awards. He may be referring to Canadian Academy Awards but the term as used in popular culture refers to an Oscar. DV may have won awards in his native Canada but he has not won any Oscar. Besides, the blogger is writing in terms of American films, as his later examples are films released in America. Even PRISONERS was released in the USA, by Warner Bros.
*Re the script by Aaron Guzikowski --
It was a Black List script and thus already won fame on its own. But sometimes they do not get made right away for many reasons. Hugh was the first one attached to the project -- we first heard about it when he told people at the box office at the Schoenfeld when STEADY RAIN was about to close that he was next due to film a drama called PRISONERS. At that time, the movie was under the watch of another fairly famous director and it was even said that it will be filmed mostly in Connecticut ( but that kept us wondering because it was approaching deep winter then). Then Hugh dropped out of the project. There were many actors rumored to take on the movie after Hugh - Wahlberg/Bale/DiCaprio) but nothing solid except maybe for the Wahlberg connection because he did take on some of the funding aspects...The movie eventually took on newbie English-language director Denis Villeneuve ( from the French-speaking part of Canada?). Hugh, who had then completed filming Les Miserables and was actually in the midst of the Oscar campaign for that movie, started filming around Oscar time. He had to segue from the many LesMis screenings to coming back to the filming of Prisoners, which by that time had moved to Georgia.
*He is probably a fan of Jake G, to have stated this --
If that were the case, it would be no different from other thrillers or any TV crime procedural focusing on child kidnapping. Instead --
The film became such an agitating classic (with a film noir atmosphere) because of the startling behavior of the father of the kidnapped girl -- his character, his reaction to the kidnapping amidst the seeming nonchalance of the authorities, his physically violent treatment of the supposed kidnapper, his unrelenting search for other possibilities... and even the unexpected ending to the movie focusing on the issue of whether he was dead or he was found alive.
Was this all rational behavior or more of that of a mentally-deteriorating condition?? Hugh Jackman's portrayal added to the dread -- the violent undercurrent when he portrays badass characters (like Wolverine or eventually like Blackbeard) was very obvious in this portrayal. You were actually afraid of him. Yet, one of the most memorable scenes was his loss of his emotional grip when he saw the supposed bloodied sock of his daughter!
*He attributed the cinematographic excellence to Villeneuve's vision.
Maybe he is not familiar with the work of Roger Deakins - the most nomimated director in Oscars history...who eventually won an Oscar for a future work ( in fairness to his collaboration with Villeneuve, Deakins won an Oscar for Blade Runner).
I wonder what he meant by the term " existential angst" in relation to this movie?
The term is generally described as --
The extreme form of anxiety and feeling of despair/hopelessness is due to the extreme reactions and actions of Keller Dover in the film. He was a parent feeling desperate about finding his kidnapped child. His efforts cause audience extreme anxiety because of the unusual and violent means he uses to find his daughter. The cinematographic work of Roger Deakins captures the marked change in environment - the warmth and family joy during Thanksgiving...and the completely bleak picture when tragedy strikes. His close-ups of the torture scenes adds to the developing tragedy as the character of Keller Dover unravels. The unremarkable scenes with the old lady produces the surprise in the story denouement. and Deakins captures that in the seemingly normal scenes in her house - giving the audience an initial feeling of trust and comfort. True, Villeneueve injects the tension into the scenes and characterizations but Deakins also contributes to the general feeling of unease and tension because of the bleak atmosphere he creates with his cinematography (which contributes to a film noir quality of the scenes). His capture of the portrayals of the tortured and the torturer was particularly hard to watch!
*Is this what made the movie so remarkable and memorable?
Again, that reaction holds true for many kidnapping stories.
What made this movie different is the infusion of remarkable character portrayals... and seeing the many different sides to their personas! The irate and violent father, the seemingly cool detective, the wife who lost her grip and turned to alcohol, the husband/wife neighbors who had opposing perspectives, the low-key demented woman and her "son", the other minor characters - they all had stories to tell! It was the coming together of these people into the resolution of a seemingly not-so-unusual crime which had the audience's minds in a grip. And such outstanding and nuanced portrayals, the most startling of all coming from Hugh Jackman!
Btw, when the movie was released in cinema, I saw it 3 times in a row - hence it allowed me to form a solid appreciation of the storytelling and its remarkable characters! Of course, when it same out on BluRay, my experience was more of someone looking for more hidden gems in this very nuanced storytelling. I also enjoyed the many discussions on IMDB ( when they still had the message boards) debating on the behavior of the father and how right or wrong it was. We also discussed how the film ended - Was he found or not? Was he alive or not? Will he be convicted or not? Will he serve a sentence or not, if convicted? Will this have changed his family - assuming he would eventually return to them? Would his kidnapped daughter be changed by the experience? Would the neighbor couple change because they had opposing perspectives? So many interesting questions/issues debated but mostly centering on the character Keller Dover and how his actions would be judged and how they would impact in the future. Nothing much was discussed on how brilliant the detective Loki was...or people wondering what other unusual crime he will or how he will resolve it!
To me, the long and continuing discussions and debates on the IMDB board gave fans of the movie an indication of the full impact of this movie on the audience!
Also, this is the full synopsis that film distributor Warner Bros wrote of this movie, for publicity purposes and as reprinted on the IMDB Page for PRISONERS --
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on May 17, 2019 17:28:17 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Sept 25, 2019 14:31:44 GMT -5
Many interesting issues are raised by the ambigious ending of the movie. JoBlo explores the discussion that is raised by the sudden FadeOut, without the audience knowing if Keller Dover is finally rescued. www.joblo.com/movie-news/what-really-happened-at-the-end-of-prisonersBtw, the film site calls Prisoners one of the best movies of the decade. Someone on Reddit posits that the reason why no awards glory at the Oscars was given, was because Warner Bros was campaigning for its own studio-produced and distributed movie, GRAVITY. Prisoners was not made by the film studio but its distribution rights were secured by Warner Bros. If that is the plausible explanation for a question that has been raised time and again … while the film continues to draw interest? Btw, does anyone even mention GRAVITY these days in film discussions Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Sept 25, 2019 14:55:48 GMT -5
Thinking about the movie Prisoners (vis-à-vis Jake Gyllenhaal) brings on the way Hugh Jackman portrays characters when he is in a two-hander with an equally strong or an interesting personality.
*With Liev Schreiber ( Jimmy and Victor - XMen Origins:Wolverine) *With Russell Crowe ( Valjean and Javert) *With Christian Bale ( The Prestige) *With Ewan Mcgregor ( Deception) *With Taron Egerton (Eddie The Eagle) *With Patrick Stewart (Logan) *With Zac Efron (Greatest Showman)
*With Daniel Craig ( A Steady Rain - Broadway)
In all cases, whether the relationship is confrontational ( Gyllenhaal/Schreiber/Crowe/Bale/McGregor/Craig) or brotherly/fatherly (Egerton, Stewart, Efron) - Hugh carves a portrayal that does not attempt to overpower his antagonist on one hand as well as delivers a portrayal that is supportive of the other character on the other hand. He is always able to give an acting performance that is very nuanced but blends well in his chemisty with the other actors. And yet he is never viewed as being the weaker character.
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Nov 28, 2019 11:18:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by njr on Nov 28, 2019 13:36:16 GMT -5
My son recently told me he came across that movie on TV and he said immediately he knew it was filmed in Georgia!
Nancy
ETA: Neglected to add, we live in Georgia!
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Nov 28, 2019 21:40:41 GMT -5
Ironically, when Hugh was first cast in PRISONERS ( while he was completing his run in A STEADY RUN - he shared the news with the box office staff at the Schoenfeld), it was first going to be filmed partly in Connecticutt...But there were many changes in the casting and the director -- for a while, Mark Walhberg and LeoDiCaprio ( and another actor I no longer remember the name of) were said to be in talks for the role of Keller Dover. Eventually, Canadian director Denis Villeneuve took over ( his first USA movie)...then the role came back to Hugh Jackman! Filming was no longer in the Northeast but had gone to Georgia.
The film has become iconic fare ( and even cited by some as a dramatic Thanksgiving Day movie) and people still talk about it on social media!
Would a sequel ever come? Where is screenwriter Aaron Guzikowski? He also did the screenwriting for Papillon and Contraband.
Maybe find out if Keller was saved by Loki?
Maybe to know how Keller's family coped in each his own way at the aftermath of the tragedy?
Maybe to find out how Paul Dano's character evolved from the difficult time...and then to be reunited with his real mom?
Maybe to find out if Loki has changed from that experience?
Maybe to know if Keller Dover will be made to account for his acts of violence, given the circumstances ?
Maybe a sequel called " The Trial of Keller Dover" ?!!
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Dec 12, 2019 17:21:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mamaleh on Dec 13, 2019 9:15:49 GMT -5
Great review! A shame this well-crafted film was ignored during awards season.
Ellen
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Dec 13, 2019 11:02:45 GMT -5
And to think it almost never happened. I remember that someone picked up from the Box Office Staff of the Schoenfeld where A STEADY RAIN was playing, that Hugh Jackman shared that this would be his next project right after.
But it did not happen as planned. Change of directors...other actors looked at role...Connecticut was dropped for later filming ( because it was winter when they actually started filming... Hugh was doing Hollywood screenings and Q&A's for Les Misérables and then he would fly to Georgia to resume filming for PRISONERS.)
I remember other actors who looked at the role included Mark Wahlberg, Christian Bale was also up for the role...and the last one was Leo DiCaprio.
Then when newbie Canadian director was announced to direct the film, it was also announced that Hugh Jackman has come back to the role.
Per Wiki notes --
I remember reading about the script as it made the Black List and fortunately it was made available online at some point.
Hugh suited the role best - because his screen persona has that quiet but internally raging quality ( almost Wolverine-like) which the Keller Dover role called for. I remember that he did get a lot of critical praise for the portrayal. How he was ignored for the awards season is beyond me. I think the SAG also ignored the cast for its most important acting ensemble award ( highest level of all the awards).
Btw, the film was Dennis Villeneuve first Hollywood film ( he came from the Canadian film industry). He has just received the accolade of BEST DIRECTOR OF THE DECADE from the Hollywood Film Critics association.
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Feb 18, 2020 20:11:07 GMT -5
Roger Deakins, who recently won another Oscar for his work in Cinematography, gave us this --
|
|
|
Post by mamaleh on Feb 18, 2020 22:52:59 GMT -5
That movie, though difficult to watch, is so adroitly made it really should have won Oscars.
Ellen
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Mar 20, 2020 11:35:14 GMT -5
Guess who won the Oscar for Best Actor for the year when Prisoners was released?
Matthew McConaughey for "Dallas Buyers Club"
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Mar 31, 2020 20:03:41 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Apr 9, 2020 4:46:17 GMT -5
There is now a REDDIT conversation on his performance in PRISONERS! All bowing down to his impressive portrayal - from the insane father to the grieving Dad! www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/fxksyp/hugh_jackmans_performance_in_prisoners_2013/I am glad I saw this movie 3 times in a cinema. The atmosphere is covered particularly well on a big screen inside a darkened movie hall. It made the scenes even more particularly chilling and throbbing. His performance was a quite a hit with critics and film sites -- why he was ignored, or the film itself ( voted 2nd best at the Toronto Film Festival, by the audience) makes me believe even more that politics ( old boys club mentality) rules the Oscars! Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Apr 13, 2020 21:45:58 GMT -5
Ahhh… that terrifying masculinity
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on May 26, 2020 19:52:41 GMT -5
This is also one of the most poignant scenes - a father sits forlorn thinking about his lost daughter. Later on, when he sees her bloodied sock and tears well in his eyes - that is a perfect acting moment for Hugh Jackman!
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Jul 11, 2020 20:41:46 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Aug 5, 2020 8:18:11 GMT -5
Fans always talk about how PRISONERS is underrated and how Hugh Jackman is really a great actor.
On Reddit --
https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/i3w7c1/hugh_jackmans_performance_in_prisoners_is/
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Aug 12, 2020 3:42:26 GMT -5
So much delayed appreciation of PRISONERS. How the AMPAS voters missed it for honors is beyond any film buff's imagination!
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Sept 30, 2020 21:23:11 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Oct 7, 2020 20:14:32 GMT -5
And sad to say, Hugh got to sing DO YOU HEAR THE PEOPLE SING only at the tail-end of the movie. Here, he delights his audience singing the song...
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
Member is Online
|
Post by jo on Oct 11, 2020 8:51:33 GMT -5
Someone lucky enough to watch filming --
|
|