jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,456
|
Post by jo on Aug 12, 2015 13:14:27 GMT -5
I wonder if the regional productions also carry the same dance production numbers ?
In addition to the singing, that also takes a lot for the actor who plays Peter to deliver.
Jo
|
|
|
Post by mamaleh on May 1, 2016 23:24:42 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,456
|
Post by jo on May 2, 2016 0:48:37 GMT -5
Thanks, Ellen. The name of the reviewer, Richard Connema, sounds familiar. However -- Unless he changed how the songs fit each situation, I think the credit for fitting in the tunes to fit the musical biopic should really go to the original creative team ( director and book writer) of the Broadway THE BOY FROM OZ. Re the fit of the songs into the biopic -- the Broadway critics were not so kind -- they called the musical all sorts of names for a jukebox musical I wonder if a Broadway revival might be forthcoming in the next few years - it has been close to 12 years since the show closed at the Imperial! If not, maybe other regional productions? Jo
|
|
|
Post by mamaleh on May 2, 2016 12:38:25 GMT -5
Jo, Richard Connema is, I believe, a San Franciscan who had worked for Warner Bros. in Burbank for decades. He is a longtime Allthatchat contributor and reviewer. He has shared fascinating anecdotes of his Hollywood days on that board.
Ellen
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,456
|
Post by jo on May 2, 2016 19:45:39 GMT -5
Lol - that is where I would come across his name -- on ALL THAT CHAT I wonder if he never saw THE BOY FROM OZ with Hugh, given his comment that it was the work of the San Francisco director which fitted the songs so seamlessly to the book in this jukebox musical, when the credit really goes to the original creative team on Broadway...or maybe actually to the original creative team in Australia but which was improved on by the Broadway group? Here's another review, this time from SFGate ( which I believe is published in the pages of the SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE) - www.sfgate.com/performance/article/Oz-lands-in-Chinatown-s-Great-Star-Theater-7387865.phpWas it just the song-clearances issue which put this show out of reach for revivals for a decade? Interesting about the critic's comment about the show being "dated"...but that "it felt enchantingly old and wonderfully new again"! Maybe San Francisco is the right venue to revive the show or to set it on a tour? Jo
|
|
|
Post by mamaleh on May 2, 2016 23:57:57 GMT -5
The 2003 B'way mounting was not a "revival," nor was TBFO one of the "earlier" jukebox musicals. Remember BEATLEMANIA and AIN'T MISBEHAVIN' in the 1970s? The writer should have done a bit more research.
At least the price is right: $25-$50 tickets. If the B'way show had been thusly priced, I'd have doubled my visits.
Ellen
|
|
|
Post by mamaleh on May 11, 2016 8:24:21 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,456
|
Post by jo on May 17, 2016 15:13:51 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,456
|
Post by jo on Apr 27, 2017 11:24:01 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,456
|
Post by jo on Aug 12, 2018 3:08:53 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,456
|
Post by jo on Aug 12, 2018 22:37:15 GMT -5
Another review of the Aussie revival -- www.timeout.com/melbourne/theatre/the-boy-from-oz-reviewEr… who would turn up to watch Todd M on Broadway... or for that matter, would it have even reached Broadway? Maybe Peter Allen fans around the tri-state but maybe not enough for the show to become the hit that it was on Broadway. And to get a key music house like the Imperial? Would it have found support like the show did with Broadway bigboss Gerald Schoenfeld who visited Hugh often and watched him on the wings a few times a week? Can't they please let go of that sentiment, after all these years ? Jo
|
|