jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Jun 28, 2017 11:06:11 GMT -5
Scott Mendelson, who seems to be quite supportive of Hugh Jackman, given the number of favorable articles he has written for FORBES on Hugh now sizes up the awards possibilities for HJ --
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Jun 28, 2017 21:36:06 GMT -5
Reposting from TGS : Publicity and Promotion.
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Jun 29, 2017 0:08:02 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Jun 30, 2017 9:41:09 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Jun 30, 2017 19:10:19 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Jun 30, 2017 19:23:06 GMT -5
Hope it does so much better than just being a family film, but also a strong contender for awards glory! It is an excellent contrast to what may be the usual Oscar bait fare in the last few months of the year.
The gold and the glory for THE GREATEST SHOWMAN!
Jo
|
|
|
Post by carouselkathy on Jun 30, 2017 19:47:19 GMT -5
Sometimes the Academy can reward a one-two punch if an actor delivers a great performance in two films in the same year. I think the members would love to acknowledge Hugh Jackman for his overall work. We know LOGAN was worthy of a best actor nomination, and it's possible that THE GREATEST SHOWMAN will also deserve consideration. Will the academy agree? Since we haven't yet seen SHOWMAN, who knows? Whatever they decide, I hope they pick one and keep the envelopes straight.
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Jun 30, 2017 19:50:35 GMT -5
From the Deadline article discussing awards potential based only on films released in the first half -- Oh-uh! BaTB may have the commercial advantage but its less-than-CERTIFIED FRESH 71% RT rating does not make it a really formidable opponent. Hopefully Unless the reviews for GREATEST SHOWMAN are allowed way ahead of its release period, the only basis for GOLDEN GLOBES honors for THE GREATEST SHOWMAN will be the screeners or special screenings for voters for the GOLDEN GLOBES ( which announces its nominations on December 11 and its wins on January 7).
|
|
|
Post by carouselkathy on Jun 30, 2017 21:03:29 GMT -5
Sometimes screenings take place before a film's release (for awards consideration).
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Jul 3, 2017 19:05:42 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Jul 11, 2017 19:10:31 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Jul 13, 2017 19:47:27 GMT -5
This portrayal is supposed to be the most formidable competition for BEST ACTOR Oscar --
Maybe I am biased for Hugh, but what I see does not remind me of clips of Winston Churchill -- who always seemed noble ( he was of royal lineage if I am not mistaken), aristocratic, and statesman-like.
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Jul 14, 2017 8:22:13 GMT -5
Jeffrey Wells of Hollwood Elswhere comments on THE DARKEST HOUR trailer and Gary Oldman's portrayal, based on the brief clip -- So, I guess my ears weren't all that biased after all Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Jul 29, 2017 19:00:58 GMT -5
Jeffrey Wells of Hollywood Elsewhere writes about updated Oscar possibilities, as movies unfold and are previewed in trailers -- His main link ( you have to scroll down to find the articles for this one and my succeeding post) -- www.hollywood-elsewhere.com/Don't read the comments There are naysayers to SHOWMAN Hope Jeff Wells knows more about the movie than those likely musicals-haters Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Jul 29, 2017 19:26:30 GMT -5
Jeffrey Wells writes a related piece -- Do read the comments -- most are NOT agreeing that DUNKIRK deserves the Best Picture Oscar Jeff Wells does have very outspoken followers On a more sober note -- Wells quotes the writer of the article who was apprehensive about the Oscar chances of Dunkirk: That is why I am batting for some dramatic elements in THE GREATEST SHOWMAN to make it more character-driven, at least in the portrayal of P.T.Barnum! But maybe -- the real secret of the film is that while people may get dazzled by the music and dance, it is really how a group of "characters" are organized by the genius of impresario Barnum to showbusiness success that will tap on the themes of individuality ( each one may have his own, likely sad, story), inclusivity ( people who are different deserve as much attention as others likely more blessed), and talent/imagination/hardwork ( who more than actors can appreciate that anyone who has those traits has a chance to succeed?)! I am also hoping that the SAG ( the actor memmbers who vote at the AMPAS) will also recognize that it takes tremendous triple-threat talent to portray a character such as what Hugh Jackman will likely display in the movie. That triple-talent versatility plus the talent to portray adversity and success also calls for the highest caliber of acting! On an aside, hope they also recognize that Hugh Jackman delivered two of the best performances this year, which is one of the most disparate portrayals ever ( a dramatic portrayal of Logan AND a triple-threat treat in Showman) and his body of work over the years has been a true tribute to their calling as actors! Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Jul 29, 2017 19:34:14 GMT -5
Hope the FOX Oscar campaign team thinks along these lines -- That was certainly self-serving and biased of me And hey, I hope the FOX team is persuadable that the time for a different kind of cinematic entertainment via THE GREATEST SHOWMAN is now the way to go -- rather than go back to " stodgy indies" - like the political drama THE PAPERS ( Spielberg/Streep/Hanks) to root for Best Picture and acting honors! JO
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Jul 31, 2017 17:50:02 GMT -5
Goldderby's PAUL SHEEHAN predicts in various Oscar categories as of end-July -- in this case, for BEST PICTURE nominations : www.goldderby.com/article/2017/2018-oscar-predictions-best-picture/THE GREATEST SHOWMAN is among many LEADING CONTENDERS. LOGAN is in second tier, among many STRONG CONTENDERS. Can you believe WONDER WOMAN lands in the first tier while LOGAN's chances are only in the second category. What is this? Popularity contest and social activism issues ... rather than exceptional filmmaking?? LOGAN has a higher overall critical rating ( 93% for LOGAN and 92% for WW at Rotten Tomatoes; average rating of 7.9 for Logan and 7.5 for WW also at RT...also slightly higher Metacritic rating for LOGAN of 77% vs 76% for WW...and even IMDB raters puts LOGAN at 8.2 while WW only earns 7.9 approval -- first user review calls WW as "a silly action movie - no masterpiece!" followed by even worse fan critiques). If there is one superhero movie that deserves to be the first nominee for Best Picture ( sorry, The Dark Knight missed its chance) , it has to be LOGAN! *Rolleyes**Rolleyes* I hope FOX is not hamstrung by its likely push for SHOWMAN and relegation of LOGAN only for outside chances. We have seen LOGAN and it was a critical hit as much as a commercial success. C'mon FOX-- give both movies equal chances! I know that it is pragmatic to push for one Best Picture candidate ( although FOX also has THE PAPERS) but in the " For your Consideration" campaign for Oscar nominations, shouldn't it also bat equally for LOGAN? Of course, with the way the SAG group within AMPAS might vote according to the rules ( it is a complicated and not an outright "one choice only"), maybe they think the second Jackman movie release might have a better chance. We'll see how SHOWMAN stacks up with the critics and audiences at yearend! On the other hand, Michael Gracey is viewed as a possible STRONG CONTENDER ( second tier) among possible nods for Directors. www.goldderby.com/article/2017/2018-oscar-predictions-best-director/James Mangold only lands in the third tier ( POSSIBLE CONTENDERS) for LOGAN. I think this is not fair in relation to the work he did for LOGAN, which was ground-breaking and exceptional for the superhero genre. Hugh Jackman is included in the first tier list of LEADING CONTENDERS for his work in THE GREATESTS SHOWMAN, while his work in LOGAN is completely ignored! But he gives Colin Farrell two chances in the third tier *rolleyes* www.goldderby.com/article/2017/2018-oscar-predictions-best-actor/We are not even sure what kind of role Michelle Williams plays in THE GREATEST SHOWMAN ( she is billed only after Zac Efron, so it is likely going to be a FEATURED/SUPPORTING role for Michelle), but Sheehan places her as a LEADING CONTENDER, with one other portrayal of hers in another movie also in the same category. It seems its her 4 previous nods which impresses Sheehan. www.goldderby.com/article/2017/2018-oscar-predictions-best-actress/Sorry, I am not very impressed with this predictor's ability! For one, he seems not to like LOGAN that much and rates its chances lower than WONDER WOMAN ( ugh... I hate it when rationales other than artistic excellence are used for OSCAR consideration -- isn't the Oscar all about artistic excellence and not an award for social activism. Please don't let the OSCARS become overly political! And he uses past performances ( and not knowledge of actual role or actual performance in current film candidates) mainly for his predictions ( guesses, more like it) *rolleyes* One last thought -- wouldn't it have been wonderful had LOGAN and THE GREATEST SHOWMAN been released in different awards years ? Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Jul 31, 2017 18:54:05 GMT -5
On the other hand, the release of two completely different portrayals ( presumed excellent for GREATEST SHOWMAN) in the same awards season ONLY strengthens the evolving perception of how good and how versatile Hugh Jackman is as an ACTOR!
That is what predictors like Sheehan ( of GOLD DERBY) should look more closely into! No offense meant, but how he puts Michelle Williams with two chances, one of which is SHOWMAN, has not much basis. Based on the trailer, there was nothing to indicate that the Charity Barnum role was equally important and was very well-performed! Yet, the contrasting portrayals by Hugh Jackman in LOGAN and THE GREATEST SHOWMAN left him unimpressed!
I hope the SAG group in AMPAS which nominates the BEST ACTOR candidates takes the exceptional performances in his two completely different movies and genres into serious consideration!
My own wishful thinking, is that at least at the Golden Globes, that Hugh gets nominated for BEST ACTOR in Drama and BEST ACTOR in Musicals/Comedy!
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Aug 3, 2017 2:05:05 GMT -5
Keala Settle impressed at a recent gala by the Hollywood Foreign Press Association ( which handles the GOLDEN GLOBES awards) -- It looks like Keala might have a chance for Best Supporting Actress, at least with the Golden Globes which has two distinct film categories - Drama AND Musicals/Comedy. Hugh had predicted the same thing about possible breakout for Keala, when he presented the first preview at CinemaCon in Las Vegas early this year. Her singing in the trailer has also impressed audiences ( THIS IS ME). One thing though, she doesn't seem to be part of the major billing -- will that be a hindrance? Also, will the other three ladies be billed in the Supporting Category ( Michelle/Rebecca/Zendaya) or will Michelle be moved up to Leading Actress category? If Michelle is moved up to Leading category, what happens to Zac's acting classification as he is billed ahead of Michelle? Hmm... c'est complicated When will we see the second trailer? And when will the publicity for the movie start racheting up? Hopefully, that will give us more clues on the relative importance of the roles assigned to the ladies. Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Aug 3, 2017 20:32:15 GMT -5
Just as I mused earlier -- people are taking notice of Keala Settle, especially for the forthcoming appearance in THE GREATEST SHOWMAN. Deadline's Pete Hammond says -- deadline.com/2017/08/hollywood-foreign-press-association-grants-2017-meryl-streep-dustin-hoffman-charity-1202142260/I could be wrong, but Keala could become the first Broadway actress to land an Oscar in her first Hollywood film in more recent times! Also, it is an original song in an original Hollywood movie musical! Jennifer Hudson ( who came from American Idol, a show on FOX TV) was reprising on the big screen the role and the singing made legendary by Jennifer Holliday from DREAMGIRLS on Broadway. There is more in store for FOX and Chairman/CEO Stacey Snider -- maybe even LOGAN, THE PAPERS ( with Spielberg/Streep/Hanks) and of course THE GREATEST SHOWMAN. Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Aug 3, 2017 20:44:03 GMT -5
I am curious ( and hopeful) -- will Hugh have a showstopper song...or maybe a showstopper song-and-dance number in the film, too ?
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Aug 4, 2017 19:01:58 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Aug 14, 2017 18:48:14 GMT -5
The Greatest Showman is already showing its creative strengths -- will it get Oscar nominations for CINEMATOGRAPHY? For COSTUMES? For HAIR & MAKEUP? For PRODUCTION DESIGN? For SOUND? For BEST ORIGINAL SONG? Maybe even for FILM SCORING?
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Aug 15, 2017 8:16:47 GMT -5
deadline.com/2017/08/academy-president-john-bailey-interview-diversity-best-picture-oscar-academy-museum-1202148924/The new AMPAS president John Bailey, 74-year old former cinematographer but AMPAS Board of Governors member for a long time, white. male, was recently interviewed by DEADLINE -- it looks like he is going on a similar advocacy as the past president ( even if the speculation with his election was that it signaled a desire of the old-boys-club at the AMPAS to a return to old practices) -- *I hope that the diversity/inclusivity/acceptance theme in THE GREATEST SHOWMAN will be an eye-opener for audiences/AMPAS as a movie dealing with the subject in a big and strongly positive manner ( rather than just adding one or two honorees who are of different races/gender/sexuality/etc in recognizing people involved in the entire film-making process). Hopefully, that a movie is out there which glorifies the diversity theme should make people at the AMPAS give it an excellent chance to be lauded! *I hope they also think that diversity includes not having the same actors being honored year after year or film after film -- I cannot believe that they have a monopoly on talent! Also, that acting honors should not be monopolized by dramatic movies actors/indie actors/dramatic biopics actors only. No flavor of the months either because the movie is different, not because it is outstanding in all respects. Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,445
|
Post by jo on Aug 16, 2017 18:46:07 GMT -5
|
|