|
Post by hughmanity on Jun 4, 2019 17:44:14 GMT -5
A lovely review. Takes special note of his musical theater numbers lovelondonloveculture.com/2019/06/04/review-hugh-jackman-the-man-the-music-the-show-the-o2/Featuring everything from The Greatest Showman to Les Miserables, it would be fair to say that this is show is a musical theatre fan’s idea of heaven – particularly when each song is performed with such charisma by Hugh Jackman, who utilises every talent he possesses to great effect to create an entertaining and warmly received show. But even if you aren’t familiar with some of the songs that are performed throughout there is still plenty to enjoy, as he recounts stories from his life up until now that have had the most impact on him and shaped what his life is like now. Each story adds a bit of intimacy that isn’t easy to achieve in a huge arena like The O2 and allows Jackman to really connect with the audience. It is clear that every element of the show has been carefully choreographed to create a slick, energetic and at times emotional show that is a thrill to watch. In particular, the Les Miserables medley was a particularly powerful moment – with Jenna Lee James providing a stunning rendition of ‘I Dreamed a Dream’, while Keala Settle got the entire crowd up onto their feet and singing along with a powerful performance of ‘This is Me’. There is also a particularly lovely version of ‘A Million Dreams’ featuring sign language that was genuinely a spine-tingling moment. There was plenty of warm humour to be found as well, such as during the segment in which Jackman reprised his role from The Boy from Oz – over the top and cheesy but worked well in the overall joy that the show exudes (he was excellent at shaking his maracas as well!). But it’s Jackman’s performances of classic musical theatre songs in a medley during the second half that really stood out and delighted. Hearing him perform a medley of ‘Luck Be a Lady’, ‘Singing in the Rain’, ‘I Got Rhythm’, ‘Stepping Out with My Baby’ and ‘Sing Sing Sing’ highlighted the smooth and playful qualities to his vocals. Followed by a stunning tap dance routine you get a real sense of why he is such a confident and natural looking stage performer. Entertaining, delightful and engaging from start to finish, it is a feel-good show with plenty to recommend it. By Emma Clarendon Hugh Jackman continues to perform at The o2 until the 7th June, before continuing to tour the world. Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,487
|
Post by jo on Jun 4, 2019 17:58:29 GMT -5
I think she used the word "choreographed" here not in a literal sense, but to express how the show was thought out, put together, and executed. For that is really the true test of how good the show is, and not simply as a vehicle to reinforce the known perception about Hugh Jackman's triple-threat talent and winning charisma! Hugh will be very pleased to read that!
Will it work with another performer? Maybe the execution can be duplicated, but it would not have the spontaneity that this personal Jackman retrospective delivers!
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,487
|
Post by jo on Jun 6, 2019 6:49:11 GMT -5
5-Star Review on CelebrityRadio, via YouTube --
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,487
|
Post by jo on Jun 19, 2019 4:51:15 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,487
|
Post by jo on Jun 23, 2019 1:34:05 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,487
|
Post by jo on Jun 23, 2019 1:39:23 GMT -5
My guess -- maybe they want the US reviews to come out of the MSG shows ? MSG shows are on June 28 and 29, 2019.
Jo
|
|
|
Post by hughmanity on Jun 23, 2019 7:04:08 GMT -5
I find this "interesting" ..I was actually wondering why I didn't see a review out of a big metro area such as Chicago.. My guess -- maybe they want the US reviews to come out of the MSG shows ? MSG shows are on June 28 and 29, 2019. Jo
|
|
|
Post by luzie on Jun 23, 2019 8:49:27 GMT -5
My guess -- maybe they want the US reviews to come out of the MSG shows ? MSG shows are on June 28 and 29, 2019. Jo I don't think so. The same happened in Europe, too. No press was invited, so there was (almost) no press coverage and hardly any reviews here either. Anyway, it's a strange and bad decision by him and his managenent IMO. Parts of the German media were quite upset and tried to get back at him with slighty negative reports and in particular with one very negative online review in one of the - unfortunately - most respected and popular weekly magazines. Overall he and his tour with the four German concerts were more or less ignored by the German press. And that's a pity!
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,487
|
Post by jo on Jun 23, 2019 9:25:03 GMT -5
From the Billboard report on touring performances --
The tour per show average revenue was $ 900,000 for the 26-show European leg. Average number of tickets per show is 11,137 thousand. Average sell rate is 97.26 % of total seats available. That seems to be an excellent sell rate -- maybe social media reactions helped the publicity exceptionally well?
We don't know who made the decision about media relations. It could be the tour promoters, and not necessarily Hugh Jackman's talent agent ( even if WME-IMG/Endeavor has now become a major force in the entertainment field, too). Hugh Jackman has no official Talent Management team but he cited his relationship with WME and co-Chairman and longtime agent Patrick Whitesell for the decision to go on a world tour.
We'll see how it will unfold in the USA.
Jo
|
|
|
Post by hughmanity on Jun 23, 2019 9:32:11 GMT -5
I am really so curious about why a decision like this would be made. Any other speculation?? My guess -- maybe they want the US reviews to come out of the MSG shows ? MSG shows are on June 28 and 29, 2019. Jo I don't think so. The same happened in Europe, too. No press was invited, so there was (almost) no press coverage and hardly any reviews here either. Anyway, it's a strange and bad decision by him and his managenent IMO. Parts of the German media were quite upset and tried to get back at him with slighty negative reports and in particular with one very negative online review in one of the - unfortunately - most respected and popular weekly magazines. Overall he and his tour with the four German concerts were more or less ignored by the German press. And that's a pity!
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,487
|
Post by jo on Jun 23, 2019 9:59:59 GMT -5
As in many cases, they are 1-show per city, unlike in the Briish Isles where there were multiple shows in each city ( 3 in Glasgow, 3 in Manchester, 3 in Birmingham, 6 in London... even 3 in Dublin if that is considered as part of the British Isles, not necessarily the United Kingdom. Maybe they did not think any local review will have a big impact on future appeal...and just decided to rely on social media to spread the word? Could be the same thinking for the single-performance cities in the USA? Social media and YouTube became the main publicity purveyors. And now Billboard itself! Just speculating Jo
|
|
|
Post by luzie on Jun 23, 2019 10:15:37 GMT -5
The four German concerts weren't sold out, I'm not sure about the other European shows. But no surprise considering the poor promo and pre-coverage here. All in all we were surprised and glad that despite the poor promo the German arenas were quite full after all.
As I said, I think not inviting any press is a bad decision and he actually has no reason for it. German media reports said that on his entire tour no press is invited. I would think that he as the star has a say in it, too! Usually there is always press invited at any concerts and shows. So this decision has caused a bit of incomprehension and displeasure. Also, it's a shame that there wasn't and isn't any press coverage here. It's like this tour (and he) wouldn't exist!
|
|
|
Post by luzie on Jun 23, 2019 10:32:11 GMT -5
German media wondered if he fears negative reviews or half-empty arenas. Not the best press but rather sort of negative backlash for him.
Usually there would have been TV coverage and widely coverage about his shows like it happens with all concert tours, especially with this kind of big arena tours. So this decision is very odd and presumably surprised the media, too.
|
|
|
Post by hughmanity on Jun 23, 2019 11:36:02 GMT -5
Thanks for the feedback Luzie and Jo.
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,487
|
Post by jo on Jun 23, 2019 18:49:58 GMT -5
Looking back --
When the first YouTube uploads of clips from the show came, I thought these are going to be taken down immediately and that the promoters would be on them right away. I even consulted Valerie as to whether we can upload them on the forum without inviting complaints.
But the clips on YT and on social media ( twitter/Instagram/etc) became more and more available.
Then it dawned on me that the promoters must be using this phenomenon for the Hugh shows ( and maybe for other concerts, too) to promote the show by heavy word-of-mouth. Maybe?
Relating it to Hugh's Broadway shows which are practically sellouts --
There is not much publicity (via ads) that happens for stage shows. Too expensive and stage shows have precarious financial positions. Theatre critics are invited as well as Tony Voters and are given complimentary tickets.
But do you remember THE BOY FROM OZ --it was lambasted by the theatre critics, save for one or two. There was a prediction that the show would close by the end of that year ( when many shows close due to the lean winter months). But it survived the lean months and by the TONYs, people were coming to see it in droves. You won't believe what the secondary market was charging for the last week of the run...with the closing show performance tickets ( official and secondary market) causing major gasps! The closing show was even written up in a review ( John Heilpern) and it highlighted the show's success -- not too many shows gets a final review.
And then there is the story of THE GREATEST SHOWMAN -- At Rotten Tomatoes, it received a ROTTEN rather than a FRESH Overall Rating ( 55%). The premiere at the QM2 was attended mostly by the TGS family and if I recall right, media was not officially invited (no free tickets)… The movie press ( not the critics) itself seemed to like giving the movie a negative speculation. Most publicity was with product or retail establishment tie=ups.
That must have had an impact on the opening weekend, where it did not do well given that it is a holiday-type movie...Then BOOM!!!!! It recorded one of the leggiest performances in Box Office history! Even Forbes had to take back its initial putdown ( calling it a movie for the TIN-TIN audiences -- although that wasn't entirely a wrong assessment - look at the young fanbase of the movie) and began reporting on its amazing week-after-week rising box office showing. Even the New York Times which gave the movie a negative rating did an unusual review via checking out with its readers why the movie was doing well week after week. They received an unprecedented number of positive replies!... At the end, it became the third largest movie musical in American box office history! And what about the soundtrack performance? Phenomenal, phenomenal! It became a Billboard hit, won many RIAA certifications ( Platinum and Gold) and eventually became the best-selling album worldwide in 2018! In the UK, it reached iconic status, breaking records. Also, the singalong craze started in the British Isles.
In either case...and maybe even in the case of #TMTMTS, are we now seeing the social phenomenon on how massive audience support transcends the traditional types of publicity? Social media and other online channels have become the new important testimonials ( positive or negative) that draw people's attention -- or good old word of mouth, except the delivery channels are now not just instantanous but also very widespread ( across national boundaries)!
Also, were the advance sales rates so good that the promoters realized there was no need to sell the show any further? Hmmm.. food for thought, too?
We'll see...
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,487
|
Post by jo on Jun 23, 2019 22:43:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by luzie on Jun 24, 2019 9:53:35 GMT -5
Looking back -- When the first YouTube uploads of clips from the show came, I thought these are going to be taken down immediately and that the promoters would be on them right away. I even consulted Valerie as to whether we can upload them on the forum without inviting complaints. But the clips on YT and on social media ( twitter/Instagram/etc) became more and more available.Then it dawned on me that the promoters must be using this phenomenon for the Hugh shows ( and maybe for other concerts, too) to promote the show by heavy word-of-mouth. Maybe? In either case...and maybe even in the case of #TMTMTS, are we now seeing the social phenomenon on how massive audience support transcends the traditional types of publicity? Social media and other online channels have become the new important testimonials ( positive or negative) that draw people's attention -- or good old word of mouth, except the delivery channels are now not just instantanous but also very widespread ( across national boundaries)! Also, were the advance sales rates so good that the promoters realized there was no need to sell the show any further? Hmmm.. food for thought, too? We'll see... Jo Well, I stick to my opinion about the silly no press approach! Social media, YouTube ... isn't everything! Sure, fans check it out, a few others as well, but the general public certainly doesn't check out any social media about an artist just because - you have to search for it deliberately. None of my friends had heard about the tour if I hadn't told them about it! I don't know how promos for tours work anywhere else, but in Germany usually there is enough press coverage before and especially afterwards. A huge arena tour is something different than a Broadway show! I go to quite many pop and rock concerts or any other shows, and there are always enough reviews and also local and widely coverage about them, in particular when big stars tour. Just the weekend before last we've been at a huge stadium concert with over 70.000 people, and of course afterwards there were tons of media reports. After Hugh's Germany concerts there was ZERO coverage. In one morning show the morning after the Berlin show they had a photo of him on his bike at a red light in Berlin from the day before, but they didn't mention at all why he was in Berlin, resp. that he gave a concert there the night before. That is very odd! We have the impression that some media folks are miffed about this entire approach, because it's simply very unusual - hence these few snarky and rather negative reports about his show. We'll see how the press covers his next movies and handles him .... Re presale for the German shows, unlike in Britain his tour was anything but a fast-selling item here. So a bit more promo and pre-coverage hadn't hurt. There are still too many people who don't have a clue that he can also sing and dance. Therefore the lack of press coverage is a great pity and a missed opportunity to make many more people aware of his versatility and his stage talents. It almost seems that except those who have attended his shows, nobody else should know about that.
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,487
|
Post by jo on Jun 30, 2019 22:19:13 GMT -5
The NYTimes has released a mixed review which I am not able to appreciate because its supposed "critic" has the underlying premise that Hugh Jackman is unable to connect with the MSG audience! She also thinks only crowds in "the theatah" can appreciate the show and not an arena! Huh ??!!...Rolleyes!!Rolleyes!!Rolleyes!!
Sorry I can't reproduce her review right now --will do that when I get home although why I should bother is a big puzzlement!
I was there to hear the roar of the crowd and deafening applause in all 3 shows I had attended! Had the show not pleased the arena crowd ...why hasn't word of mouth spread? That huge arena was packed in all 3 shows. The only complaint I heard from the lady beside me who said she is a Jackman fan (she practically saw the whole show thru the lens of her camera) was that Hugh did not do a half- hour encore like Elton John did!
I wonder if theNYTimes lady critic was miffed because she had to pay for her ticket? Or also wanted another half-hour of more songs? Or thinks arena audiences do not or cannot appreciate serious songs like two very different soliloquys which showed HJ's excellent dramatic talent to the fullest?
Had we not seen official reviews from the British Isles, people may think I am just biased -- but I wonder who is more biased between the 2 of us?
PS to hughmanity --- pls post at least the link if you come across the NYTimes review. Thanks !
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,487
|
Post by jo on Jun 30, 2019 23:37:51 GMT -5
Digital Journal gives The show an "A" rating and lists down the reasons why it deserves it completely!
If anyone can please post it now - I won't be able to do that until many days later - thanks!
Jo
|
|
|
Post by mamaleh on Jul 1, 2019 1:05:43 GMT -5
I was bemused by that Times review —not by Ben Brantley or Jesse Green but by a woman whose name I cannot recall. She thought HJ didn’t adequately connect with his audience. That line dumbfounded me. Connecting is something he does with great ease. What show did she see?
Earlier this evening I saw my fourth HJ show of the weekend, this time in Philadelphia. As much as I liked the MSG shows, I cannot imagine any other performance as spectacular or ingratiating as this one. He was loose, freewheeling and on fire throughout, whether joking Peter Allen-style with a latecomer or sending the show ticket of an erstwhile Price-Waterhouse employee out to be laminated. There were too many other similar delights to mention, but suffice to say the whole packed arena was with him all the way. That Times reporter definitely holds a minority opinion.
Ellen
|
|
|
Post by hughmanity on Jul 1, 2019 7:25:09 GMT -5
Here's the link. I was not on line all day yesterday, and just came across it this morning. Read the whole thing with my mouth agape. "Awkward" when talking about his own life? That he has never been. "Red -Rimmed Eyes" ? Yes, when he recalled his dad and sang the emotional Soliloquy. (and Valjean'sSoliloquy). Please. Just wish this wasn't such a "prominent" review www.nytimes.com/2019/06/30/theater/hugh-jackman-madison-square-garden-review.htmlThe NYTimes has released a mixed review which I am not able to appreciate because its supposed "critic" has the underlying premise that Hugh Jackman is unable to connect with the MSG audience! She also thinks only crowds in "the theatah" can appreciate the show and not an arena! Huh ??!!...Rolleyes!!Rolleyes!!Rolleyes!! Sorry I can't reproduce her review right now --will do that when I get home although why I should bother is a big puzzlement! I was there to hear the roar of the crowd and deafening applause in all 3 shows I had attended! Had the show not pleased the arena crowd ...why hasn't word of mouth spread? That huge arena was packed in all 3 shows. The only complaint I heard from the lady beside me who said she is a Jackman fan (she practically saw the whole show thru the lens of her camera) was that Hugh did not do a half- hour encore like Elton John did! I wonder if theNYTimes lady critic was miffed because she had to pay for her ticket? Or also wanted another half-hour of more songs? Or thinks arena audiences do not or cannot appreciate serious songs like two very different soliloquys which showed HJ's excellent dramatic talent to the fullest? Had we not seen official reviews from the British Isles, people may think I am just biased -- but I wonder who is more biased between the 2 of us? PS to hughmanity --- pls post at least the link if you come across the NYTimes review. Thanks ! Jo
|
|
|
Post by ADMIN on Jul 1, 2019 10:19:47 GMT -5
Here's the New York Times review mentioned above -
Review: Hugh Jackman Isn’t Quite the Greatest Showman in an Arena His world tour “The Man. The Music. The Show.” stopped at Madison Square Garden.
But it would have been better on Broadway.
By Laura Collins-Hughes June 30, 2019
Hugh Jackman during his arena tour concert “The Man. The Music. The Show.” at Madison Square Garden. Credit The New York Times
I have not seen this show YET and, while I agree that a smaller venue is always more intimate (and therefore preferable?) to a huge one, I think she's missing the point. "Apples to oranges" as it were, like comparing TBFO at The Imperial to Hugh's tour of the production Down Under. The two things defy comparison - and I'm more than happy to enjoy BOTH.
. . . IMHO - this "review" deserves a herd of turds!
|
|
|
Post by hughmanity on Jul 1, 2019 13:18:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mamaleh on Jul 1, 2019 15:44:29 GMT -5
Ms. Collins-Hughes must have swallowed a cup of battery acid before forming her view of TMTMTS and its star.
Ellen
|
|
|
Post by hughmanity on Jul 4, 2019 17:34:42 GMT -5
|
|