jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,480
|
Post by jo on Sept 11, 2019 17:40:28 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,480
|
Post by jo on Sept 11, 2019 17:47:46 GMT -5
Brian Tallerico is Editor of the influential RogerEbert.com --
|
|
|
Post by hughmanity on Sept 11, 2019 18:48:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by hughmanity on Sept 11, 2019 18:58:24 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,480
|
Post by jo on Sept 11, 2019 20:06:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by hughmanity on Sept 11, 2019 20:54:58 GMT -5
Still not doing it right, lol, but wanted to reprint this one as a follow up to Tallerico's tweets TIFF 2019: BAD EDUCATION, A BEAUTIFUL DAY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, HEARTS AND BONES by Brian Tallerico
September 11, 2019 | 2 Print Page
It could be an attempt to redeem a profession from charges of fake news or just an easy way to provide an audience surrogate into a story, but there were at least three films at TIFF this year that I saw that included a journalist’s POV. Now, they are very different journalists—an Esquire staffer, a teen at her school’s paper, and an internationally famous photojournalist—but they happen to have one important thing in common: they're all central in films I would recommend.
The best of the three is Cory Finley’s “Bad Education,” a refined dramedy that drew comparisons to “Election” after its premiere, but people shouldn’t seek out hoping for big laughs. This is more of a social commentary, about how easily corrupt people can convince themselves they are doing good. We like to delude ourselves into thinking that corruption only comes from truly morally bankrupt people. That's not always the case. Instead of just delivering a by-the-numbers accounting of a true story, Finley has delivered a nuanced film about how nothing is quite as black and white as it seems. Don’t get me wrong—it is in no way a redemption piece for criminals, but it does see them as complex human beings in a way that’s dramatically rewarding.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Bad Education” tells a story you may remember: the Nassau County Schools scandal, in which administrators in the Roslyn school district were accused and convicted of embezzling more money from their job than any educator before them. Finley’s film opens before the curtain was lifted as Superintendent Frank Tassone (Hugh Jackman) and his Assistant Superintendent Pam Gluckin (Allison Janney) are celebrating another successful year. The students at the school do very well, getting into major colleges, and the financial success of the school has allowed them to break ground on an exciting new construction project called Skywalk. When she’s assigned to do a puff piece on that for the school paper, Rachel Kellog (Geraldine Viswanathan) uncovers a few inconsistencies in the books, and it’s not long before this entire house of cards collapses.
The entire ensemble is incredibly strong, including great supporting work by Rafael Casal, but this film belongs to Jackman, as a man who believes his people are doing the right thing, even when presented with their crimes. And he may not be wrong. What’s the harm if administrators at a prestigious school pocket a little of the money earmarked for education in order to present an image of success? We don’t pay school officials enough money on any level, so if they have to take some donations that would fix a leaky roof in order to buy a new suit in order to woo donors, who loses? One of the most fascinating conversations in “Bad Education” occurs when the scandal first comes to light and before the authorities knew about it and the board has to decide how to handle it. If they make it public, kids who got into Dartmouth or Yale may have their acceptances revoked. Who would that help?
Jackman does some of the best work of his career here, finding fascinating gray areas in a man who is holding a few secrets of his own from his fellow administrators. The film overall can be a little too low energy—but there are interesting acting choices throughout, and some really fascinating discussion topics for when it’s over.
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,480
|
Post by jo on Sept 11, 2019 21:06:37 GMT -5
That is why I have everything crossed that the film is picked up by " a deep-pocketed buyer" so it can give it the proper wide exposure and highlighting that Hugh Jackman deserves to be in the OSCAR conversation!
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,480
|
Post by jo on Sept 11, 2019 21:07:29 GMT -5
I just realized nobody (outside the TIFF-goers) has even seen a trailer Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,480
|
Post by jo on Sept 11, 2019 22:01:25 GMT -5
Brian Tallerico really likes BAD EDUCATION --
He posted this the day after he saw the screening --
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,480
|
Post by jo on Sept 12, 2019 10:18:54 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,480
|
Post by jo on Sept 12, 2019 10:52:10 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,480
|
Post by jo on Sept 12, 2019 11:01:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by hughmanity on Sept 12, 2019 20:17:06 GMT -5
TIFF 2019 Review: BAD EDUCATION Is A Good Lesson On Everyday Greed Corey Finley’s follow-up to THOROUGHBREDS makes an unbelievable true story hit scarily close to home. By ABBY OLCESE Sep. 12, 2019 4 Comments
82 Shares
A couple of years ago, my high school paper made national news when its student reporters discovered their newly hired district superintendent had falsified her credentials. It was stunning at the time not only because it was impressive that a group of teenagers had broken the story, but because they were easily able to find red flags that the adults on the school board had overlooked. As an alumna, and a former newspaper kid, I was proud of them, but also kind of baffled. I knew several of the people on that board. They weren’t dumb. How had this woman duped them into passing her through the interview process without a second glance?
I thought about that story a lot while watching Thoroughbreds director Cory Finley’s new film Bad Education, based on a real-life scandal that rocked Long Island’s Roslyn school district in the early 2000s. Like my hometown, the scandal involved the superintendent—in this case Frank Tassone, a long-established leader of the school district who admitted to stealing millions of dollars from the schools over about a decade. Like my hometown, the story was also broken by a high school newspaper. Finley’s movie also asks and attempts to answer the same questions I’d had: how did this happen? And how did intelligent adults let it go so far?
It would be very easy to sensationalize this story, to make Hugh Jackman’s Tassone a mustache-twirling villain, or his colleagues a bunch of image-obsessed goofballs. But Bad Education, which was also written by a former Roslyn student, Mike Makowsky, doesn’t do that. Instead, it’s a very human movie that avoids making outright villains of anyone, Tassone included. Finley and Makowsky tell a story that twists and turns in some pretty odd ways, but always grounds its characters’ decisions in real emotions and desires.
Finley shows this story through several perspectives, but Tassone is its main one. He’s the respected superintendent of the Roslyn school district, having brought it national ranking and high numbers of Ivy League college-bound seniors. The high school is constructing a fancy new skyway that Tassone hopes will bring them a number one ranking. But there’s a problem. Just weeks before a scheduled vote to approve the district budget, it’s discovered that assistant superintendent Pam Gluckin (Allison Janney) has been embezzling from the schools’ coffers for years, amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars in misspent funds.
Tassone and his colleagues manage to cover Pam’s crimes up. But even after she resigns, the problem doesn’t go away. Rachel (Geraldine Vishwanathan), a high school reporter assigned to cover the new skyway project, notices that while there’s apparently money for new construction, there are still major issues with her school’s existing facilities. Listed contractors for the district turn out never to have worked with Tassone, or to be totally invented. And considering he lives on a teacher’s salary, Tassone is always conspicuously well-dressed, and drives a nicer car than anyone else in the district. As the truth comes out, parents and colleagues alike are shocked at the extent of the district’s rot.
At the surface level, these would appear to be the actions of evil people. But they’re not. Bad Education goes out of its way to show how much Tassone and Gluckin care about the district, the teachers and the students. Tassone is involved. He goes to conferences, knows current and former students by name, and makes an effort to know personal details about educators. Gluckin is flagrant in her greed and opulent lifestyle, but she’s not necessarily selfish. She lets her niece, a single mother, in on her spending, and pays her numbskull son to do the contract work on her house, because the poor kid needs a job. When Rachel writes up her story for the paper, she debates the ethics of publishing it, knowing that the results would ruin the lives of people who worked hard to make hers better.
Jackman gives a possible career-best performance as Tassone, projecting a genuine air of geniality and caring, while keeping the actual details of his life under wraps. What he does outside of the office doesn’t matter. The schools are the only thing that matters. His selfless effort and kind attention make him hugely sympathetic. Even after it’s revealed that he stole millions from the schools, you still want him to be happy. As a former teacher and an administrator, Tassone felt he was owed for putting up with helicopter parents and a community that took him for granted. Given the power to treat himself the way he felt he deserved, he took it.
From its relatable characters to its muted cinematography and intentionally bland set design, Bad Education is crafted to show us that the “unbelievable” story at its center isn’t over-the-top at all. It’s the tale of a banal crime committed by flawed human beings taken in by traditional ideas of material success, and given the tools to take that success for themselves. It feels like a decidedly American story, one that highlights our current capitalist impulses, and our willingness to overlook blatant warning signs in the leaders who promise us success.
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,480
|
Post by jo on Sept 12, 2019 20:28:20 GMT -5
Many reviews resonate about current society's mores and morality and how the movie brings them out without overly dramatizing the facts and behavioral patterns. True to life, sad as it may sound.
Btw, I wish the moviegoing public supports movies of this kind...rather than being giddy about tentpoles. The young people growing up should also see how the non-superheroes live their ordinary lives.
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,480
|
Post by jo on Sept 13, 2019 17:55:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by hughmanity on Sept 13, 2019 18:47:08 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,480
|
Post by jo on Sept 13, 2019 21:18:36 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,480
|
Post by jo on Sept 15, 2019 1:08:03 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,480
|
Post by jo on Sept 15, 2019 7:54:08 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,480
|
Post by jo on Sept 15, 2019 8:00:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by hughmanity on Sept 15, 2019 21:34:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mamaleh on Sept 16, 2019 7:11:33 GMT -5
I'm hopeful that HJ will be recognized come awards season even if the film itself doesn't get A+ reviews. Not so long ago Rami Malek won his Best Actor Oscar for BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY, which received only mixed-to-good reviews. So there's hope--assuming it finds a responsible buyer/distributor and becomes eligible.
Ellen
|
|
|
Post by hughmanity on Sept 16, 2019 19:17:45 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,480
|
Post by jo on Sept 16, 2019 19:45:48 GMT -5
The reviews can only strengthen the selling point of this movie -- hope it gets the full attention it deserves, via a more welcome distribution channel and more awards attention! Interesting how the ratings at IMDB have now risen to 7.9 of 10 from 105 voters ( which dovetails with the current Metacritic rating of 79 ( based on Metacritic's selected reviewers). Metacritic is more rigid compared to Rotten Tomatoes, whose current rating is also 79% based on 19 reviews. The IMDB vote distribution is now quite even among all the demos ( age/gender/nationality) www.imdb.com/title/tt8206668/ratings?ref_=tt_ov_rtJo
|
|
|
Post by hughmanity on Sept 18, 2019 18:17:53 GMT -5
A couple of new reviews up at RT; the film now stands at 85%. It still stands at 100% for top critics, albeit there are not too many of those. (And we will probably have to wait for release time for many more!)
|
|