jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,456
|
Post by jo on Jan 13, 2013 17:24:40 GMT -5
There was another reception for the rounds of awards... and there Hugh proclaimed again that he is " actually British"! metro.co.uk/2013/01/13/golden-globes-star-hugh-jackman-im-actually-british-3349895/----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  Australian actor Hugh Jackman is keen to win for Britain (Getty) Golden Globes star Hugh Jackman: I’m actually BritishBy Andrei Harmsworth Sunday 13 Jan 2013 7:00 pm Celeb He’s supposed to be the most famous Aussie on the planet but Hugh Jackman said his screen success would be a win for Britain as he lined up for Golden Globe glory last night. The Les Miserables star was instead counting himself as a true Brit as he got suited and booted ahead of his bid for a hat-trick of gongs at the Globes, Baftas and Oscars. ‘You know I’m British, I have a British passport, this is duty of the realm,’ the 44-year-old star beamed as he warmed up at the 2013 BAFTA Tea Party held at the Four Seasons Hotel Los Angeles in Beverly Hills. The star’s parents Grace Watson and former Cambridge graduate Christopher Jackman moved Downunder in the sixties. And for that reason their megastar son said he was pleased to toast his run at a British bash. ‘I am unbelievably honoured to even be in this dance and I’ve actually been on the other side of this dance hosting a few things, presenting so it’s very nice to be here, it’s humbling and it’s a great opportunity to see my fellowcountry men and women.’ Hugh’s alliance gave our British contingent at the Globes a major boost... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,456
|
Post by jo on Jan 29, 2013 9:34:51 GMT -5
 I wish the awards community is not so easily led by politics or negative sentiments! Jo |
|
|
|
Post by njr on Jan 29, 2013 17:17:35 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,456
|
Post by jo on Jan 30, 2013 7:19:19 GMT -5
Another FYC ad - but very evocative of the tearful finale!  |
|
|
|
Post by birchie on Jan 30, 2013 9:47:29 GMT -5
Another FYC ad - but very evocative of the tearful finale! When do Oscar voters vote??? I'm annoyed that Universal waited so long to start showing some of these great stills. Most of the earlier FYC seemed to be rehashed posters or focusing on Anne! Even this one has Anne in it when there are probably plenty of death scene stills of just Hugh! I think they did a lousy job of promoting Hugh for the awards!  Sue |
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,456
|
Post by jo on Jan 30, 2013 11:26:58 GMT -5
I strongly agree about your comments on Hugh not being favored with most-favored-actor treatment for this movie, Sue!! My comments are somewhat ...And it is not just us -- someone on IMDB ( I still read any updates) has come up with a thread called " Les Miserables has become the Anne Hathaway movie!" For one, why couldn't they have had the SOLILOQUY moments as the thrust of one trailer? *It signified one of the most, if not the most, compelling themes of Les Miserables -- faith and redemption! Much more so than the anguish of Fantine! Hrmphh!! *It portrayed the lead actor in one of his most praised moments in the film. Maestro-20, who has made some astute comments has written repeatedly that this particular scene is the " That is his Oscar moment!" *It would have made a more positive impression of the movie itself before people get to see it - instead of the IDAD moments which harped too much on the theme of oppression. Also, I don't understand why they did not use The Confrontation as another trailer material -- it represented another strong theme that ran in the movie, that of the duality of values, as well as a good visual representation of the endless pursuit between convict and the arm of justice. It is one of the most impressive scenes -- syncopated singing ( very hard to do!), fight sequence with different weapons, acting while doing singing and fighting. It was also quite a suspenseful moment and would have appealed to a wider movies demos. Finally, it would have done some justice to Russell's participation in the movie -- I think he had been unfairly treated in all the promotions. Universal, even if it employed supposedly one of the street-smartest for Oscar-lobbying, did not seem to have given their movie ( and its lead actor) the right push! And I feel bad because Les Miserables has been a special favorite with me for a long, long time! And the movie promotion itself (not just the awards promotion) could have been more positive. How could such a beloved story with such compelling characters get attributed with negative reactions at the rate of 30% of 100% of total reviews?? And the performances were so well-praised?? Through the ages, it is not Argo, or Silver Linings Playbook or Life of Pi or even the historical Lincoln as a film will be remembered as much as the literary and artistic legacy that Les Miserables will continue to achieve worldwide! Such a wasted opportunity! I think the start of voting is early February, so the rush of FYC ads and media articles on the BP nominees and lead acting honors will likely come up once more. Sadly, I have become very disillusioned about this whole exercise -- not just for Hugh -- but reading about the politicking and some of the stupid things some of the personalities have been quoted with. I wish the voters would also leave a real legacy of only the finest, not of the loudest-hyped! C'est la vie! Jo |
|
|
|
Post by israruth on Jan 30, 2013 12:17:49 GMT -5
I absolutely agree with everything you say Jo. It is beyond ridiculous that Argo (merely a competent movie, nothing more) should be rated above Les Miserables. But it is true that many great movies and great performances did not get the awards they deserved. C'est la vie!
|
|
|
|
Post by birchie on Jan 30, 2013 12:32:11 GMT -5
I strongly agree about your comments on Hugh not being favored with most-favored-actor treatment for this movie, Sue!! My comments are somewhat ...And it is not just us -- someone on IMDB ( I still read any updates) has come up with a thread called " Les Miserables has become the Anne Hathaway movie!" For one, why couldn't they have had the SOLILOQUY moments as the thrust of one trailer? *It signified one of the most, if not the most, compelling themes of Les Miserables -- faith and redemption! Much more so than the anguish of Fantine! Hrmphh!! *It portrayed the lead actor in one of his most praised moments in the film. Maestro-20, who has made some astute comments has written repeatedly that this particular scene is the " That is his Oscar moment!" *It would have made a more positive impression of the movie itself before people get to see it - instead of the IDAD moments which harped too much on the theme of oppression. Also, I don't understand why they did not use The Confrontation as another trailer material -- it represented another strong theme that ran in the movie, that of the duality of values, as well as a good visual representation of the endless pursuit between convict and the arm of justice. It is one of the most impressive scenes -- syncopated singing ( very hard to do!), fight sequence with different weapons, acting while doing singing and fighting. It was also quite a suspenseful moment and would have appealed to a wider movies demos. Finally, it would have done some justice to Russell's participation in the movie -- I think he had been unfairly treated in all the promotions. Universal, even if it employed supposedly one of the street-smartest for Oscar-lobbying, did not seem to have given their movie ( and its lead actor) the right push! And I feel bad because Les Miserables has been a special favorite with me for a long, long time! And the movie promotion itself (not just the awards promotion) could have been more positive. How could such a beloved story with such compelling characters get attributed with negative reactions at the rate of 30% of 100% of total reviews?? And the performances were so well-praised?? Through the ages, it is not Argo, or Silver Linings Playbook or Life of Pi or even the historical Lincoln as a film will be remembered as much as the literary and artistic legacy that Les Miserables will continue to achieve worldwide! Such a wasted opportunity! I think the start of voting is early February, so the rush of FYC ads and media articles on the BP nominees and lead acting honors will likely come up once more. Sadly, I have become very disillusioned about this whole exercise -- not just for Hugh -- but reading about the politicking and some of the stupid things some of the personalities have been quoted with. I wish the voters would also leave a real legacy of only the finest, not of the loudest-hyped! C'est la vie! Jo I agree on all counts. I share your disillusionment fully! The almost complete focus on Anne throughout the film promo period was unforgivable. I think the minute people started tweeting how much the liked her IDaD Universal decided they had a winner and didn't bother to remember that it was Hugh's movie! Even Tom & Cam say that and yes, Anne too so what is wrong with the people at Universal to have so thoroughly missed the boat? I actually have come to hate the IDaD moment and when I watch the screener I have access to, I admit that I fast forward through that part. With so many Oscar worthy moments that Hugh displayed in the movie there should have been a trailer focusing on that and these FYC images still don't focus enough on him. You're right about Russell and the confrontation too. The biggest showcase was One Day More which I didn't think was his best moment. They also showed the opening scene with him & Hugh but I think Hugh dominated that scene so the confrontation would have been a better way to showcase him since he has a big ending in that one plus the action and drama moments. All in all I too am completely disgusted with the whole awards thing. I now know much more than I ever wanted to know and won't be watching the Oscars the same way ever. With the news today about Barbra Streisand performing it gives me another reason to watch this year but I don't think I'll ever watch them again from beginning to end like I used to. Sad but true! I'm going to post the link about Barbra if nobody has done it yet. Sue |
|
|
|
Post by birchie on Jan 30, 2013 12:36:29 GMT -5
It was announce that Barbra Streisand will perform at the Academy Awards: t.co/vLxGeOemBarbra Streisand Will Perform at the Oscars for the First Time in 36 Years
News By Josh Ferri January 30, 2013 - 11:23AM
Get your DVR ready because Barbra Streisand is singing at the Oscars! Streisand will perform at the Academy Awards ceremony on February 24.
Streisand has not performed at the Academy Awards in 36 years. Her first and only Oscar performance was singing the love theme from “A Star is Born” back in 1977. The diva won her first Oscar for the movie musical Funny Girl in 1968 and a subsequent trophy for "Evergreen" in 1977. Her other movie musical credit is starring in the film adaptation of the Broadway musical Hello, Dolly! Streisand is also planning to star in a new film version of Gypsy. Could it be Babs will appear on the telecast as be part of the previously announced tribute to movie musicals?
“In an evening that celebrates the artistry of movies and music how could the telecast be complete without Barbra Streisand?” said Oscars producers Craig Zadan and Neil Meron in a statement.
The 85th Academy Awards, hosted by Seth MacFarlane, will be broadcast live on February 24 on ABC. Sue |
|
|
|
Post by birchie on Jan 30, 2013 12:44:58 GMT -5
There is another thing i want to say about the various reactions, remarks and attitudes re: Les Miserables. I've been rather disappointed with what some of the well known Broadway personalities have said, or worse yet NOT said about the movie. There have been so many that haven't said a word! We know about Stephanie being a bit snarky and we heard that Patti hadn't even seen it and recently I found out that Seth Rudetsky hasn't seen it either. This disinterest & disrespect from the Broadway crowd really surprised me. Also since they are SAG voters it makes me wonder how many of them voted without having seen the movie. I don't get it...I don't suppose I'll ever get it!  Sue |
|
|
|
Post by annetter on Jan 30, 2013 20:41:43 GMT -5
Totally agree. Anne was featured as "top dog" from the beginning. I think the Universal Marketing Dept. missed the boat and Hugh is getting shafted. It's really sad and very frustrating and I, like you, am damn pissed.
I was lucky enough to have a chance to talk to Hugh for a hot minute this past weekend and told him that no matter what happens he is # 1 with us. As you would expect, he has a great attitude and is taking everything in his stride. He sure does look like he is having fun at all the award shows. And he's only 44. Hopefully he will have many more Oscar worthy roles in the future.
|
|
|
|
Post by birchie on Jan 30, 2013 21:53:07 GMT -5
Totally agree. Anne was featured as "top dog" from the beginning. I think the Universal Marketing Dept. missed the boat and Hugh is getting shafted. It's really sad and very frustrating and I, like you, am damn pissed. I was lucky enough to have a chance to talk to Hugh for a hot minute this past weekend and told him that no matter what happens he is # 1 with us. As you would expect, he has a great attitude and is taking everything in his stride. He sure does look like he is having fun at all the award shows. And he's only 44. Hopefully he will have many more Oscar worthy roles in the future. He is so calm & realistic about everything. I do smell a "make up" Oscar in his future. Of course they will call it that no matter how well deserved it is too!  Can't win with these things.  Sue |
|
|
|
Post by birchie on Jan 30, 2013 22:02:56 GMT -5
I have to tell you all this. Speaking of things they could use for their FYC campaigning...i was watching the screener I mentioned previously and paused it to go to the little room down the hall and when I came back I was floored by the image on my screen! I had paused it at about 1:23 right after Cosette leaves JVJ's room and the camera lingers on him for a couple seconds. i never really took in that image until it sat there paused on my big TV. Hands folded and the total look of a man who has struggled in life for so many years-that 1 look said volumes! I don't have access to a computer version so i can't screen cap it so if someone has better stuff than me maybe they can do a screen capture. That image should be the one they use for the FYC ads instead of that deathbed scene with Anne that I'm seeing all over the internet. Arrgghh!! Sue |
|
|
|
Post by Jamie on Jan 31, 2013 10:23:17 GMT -5
That is an example of what all of us see in Hugh's work ... the sidelong glance, the momentary quirk of his mouth, the eyebrow that packs pages of meaning. They are the mark of a great actor where you can see the brain behind the character behind the face. It is so frustrating when others just brush it off or it gets missed in the adventure films and now by all the focus on how the musical was filmed.... one long extended grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr I can only hope this gift to theater will finally get the recognition he deserves.
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,456
|
Post by jo on Jan 31, 2013 11:53:02 GMT -5
I also posted this on TV ALERTS --
It seems Hugh will be appearing for the 2nd time on INSIDE THE ACTORS STUDIO on February 13, per these two tweets :
As the final Oscar voting deadline is Feb 19, this could be part of his final promotion run for his role in Les Miserables? Although ITAS interviews really cover the significant aspects of an actor's professional career, this would be an excellent time to pause and review what Hugh has accomplished since the first interview ( when he had just opened The Boy from Oz, in 2003).
That was one of his best interviews ever! Hope the discussions from then on -- on his return to the theatre ( A Steady Rain, Back on Broadway), his filmography ( The Fountain, The Prestige, XMen-3 and Origins, Happy Feet and Flushed Away, Real Steel, and Les Miserables ), his hosting gigs ( 2004/2005 Tonys and 2009 Oscars) and his outside advocacies will make interesting stories for discussion!
Hope this is confirmed!
Jo
|
|
|
|
Post by bandala on Jan 31, 2013 16:14:49 GMT -5
That is an example of what all of us see in Hugh's work ... the sidelong glance, the momentary quirk of his mouth, the eyebrow that packs pages of meaning. They are the mark of a great actor where you can see the brain behind the character behind the face. It is so frustrating when others just brush it off or it gets missed in the adventure films and now by all the focus on how the musical was filmed.... one long extended grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr I can only hope this gift to theater will finally get the recognition he deserves. First time I saw him in a film: X2. He is walking through the snow and arrives at that Lake. He sees a wolf. He just cocks his head and stares at the wolf for a bit. It was amazing! Then, I back tracked and watched X-Men. "Every time." What a killer! And THEN.. Someone Like You: "Rebecca." So much pain in that one word! All that rambling to say, in agreement, that he is the master of the small expression or one word line that communicates volumes. And all that to say that the first time I saw him on stage, and then on film, I knew he was one of a kind. |
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,456
|
Post by jo on Feb 1, 2013 17:27:57 GMT -5
bigpondnews.com/articles/Entertainment/2013/02/02/Russell_Crowe_backs_Jackman_for_Oscar_841663.html--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Russell Crowe backs Jackman for Oscar Saturday, February 02, 2013 » 07:12am Hugh Jackman's Les Miserables co-star Russell Crowe announced he voted for Jackman for the best actor Oscar. Daniel Day-Lewis may be the red-hot favourite for the best actor Oscar, but Hugh Jackman has at least one vote. Jackman's Les Miserables co-star Russell Crowe announced via Twitter he has voted for Jackman, declaring his performance in the musical as more difficult than Day-Lewis's portrayal of US President Abraham Lincoln. 'Voted Hugh Jackman as Best Actor for the Oscars,' Crowe tweeted.
'The character arc, the degree of difficulty, way more responsibility than any other nominee.'After dominating all of the lead-up Hollywood awards, Day-Lewis is expected to win the third Oscar of his career at the Academy Awards ceremony on February 24 for his performance in the biopic, Lincoln. Jackman is a distant second favourite. The Academy of Motion Picture Arts Sciences, which decides the Oscars, has about 6000 voting members who are the elite of Hollywood. Australian members include Crowe, Nicole Kidman, Cate Blanchett, Jacki Weaver and Eric Bana, while the likes of Steven Spielberg, Tom Hanks and Julia Roberts are also in Hollywood's most respected club. Crowe may get into hot water with the Academy for announcing who he voted for - doing so is frowned upon by the academy.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you, mate!! Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,456
|
Post by jo on Feb 1, 2013 17:49:26 GMT -5
Russell's TWITTER account is busy ;D
His message supporting Hugh has been retweeted 613 times as of now and he is taking on all responses to the message.
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,456
|
Post by jo on Feb 1, 2013 18:13:07 GMT -5
Here's a feature on the Oscar-nominated Production Design for Les Miserables -- www.vanityfair.com/online/oscars/2013/02/les-miserables-oscar-nominated-sets-barricade#slide=1----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sketch to Still: Les Misérables Designer Eve Stewart on the Animals, Cosette’s Jewel-Like Hideout, and the Hand-Pieced Furniture Barricade ByMarnie Hanel 3:00 PM, February 1 2013 In a recurring series, Vanity Fair pulls back the curtain on awards season’s most visually enticing films, revealing exclusive details of the creative process of art directors, costume designers, makeup artists, cinematographers, and more. This week, Eve Stewart—nominated this year for her third Oscar—discusses her production design for Tom Hooper’s Les Misérables. While much has been made of the live singing in Les Misérables, few critics have considered how it challenged the crew. “My entire scenery had to be completely silent!” says production designer Eve Stewart. Fortunately, the three-time Oscar nominee is at her best when finding creative solutions for necessary constraints. (To wit: To compensate for a shortage of extras while filming The King’s Speech, Stewart filled empty chairs with dummies. She even named them.) This time, she employed a new set of tricks: to muffle hoof-beats, Stewart created rubber shoes for the horses. To stop rhythmic raindrops, she draped rooftops with blankets painted to look like tiles. To prevent the painstakingly handmade beads from clacking in the factory, she replaced them with rubber beads. She even distributed wool hats to the film crew, “in case rain hit their heads and bashed off.” The designer’s tremendous sense of fun shines through her sketches, too. (To your blogger, they recall Quentin Blake’s fantastic illustrations for Roald Dahl.) Before she sat down to visualize Hooper’s take on the West End classic, Stewart considered all former adaptations. “I was very familiar with the London production,” Stewart says. “I loved John Napier’s set, especially the twirling barricade—we wanted to pay homage to that, but making a film, you have to do it in a different way.” Often, Stewart says, they used that difference to their advantage. “We were trying to achieve the views that you could never get in the theater. One being the great big long shot. One being a very big close-up. Through the long shot, we were trying to make people look like they weren’t important—that they were just a number to the state. We were trying to emphasize that. You only let your soul out when you’re completely alone.” As additional research, Stewart (who’s from England) retraced Jean Valjean’s journey through France. She consulted a professional pickpocket to devise the ways in which the Thénardiers (played by Helena Bonham Carter and Sacha Baron Cohen) would rob their guests blind. And she culled inspiration from personal experience: the gauze-curtained hospital where Fantine dies recalls Stewart's childhood memory of visiting her ailing grandmother. But the richest resource was Victor Hugo’s novel. After reading it, Stewart set out to re-create the vividly described images. In the novel, young Gavroche sleeps in a giant plaster elephant that had been built as a symbol of the emperor’s supremacy. In the film, he rides it in the final sequence. In one departure from the play, Stewart decided to use more color in her designs. “On the stage, it’s very blue and gray. Very cold. [But] if you look at pictures of the poorest areas of the world, India, South America, they’re always really vibrant,” she says. “People have a stamp on their own square foot of life. That’s what I wanted to show.” The designer also endeavored to create a certain downtrodden patina over the film—as if everyone really was enduring “a hard life.” The buildings, she says, “all were skinny, and they were collapsing and too tired to go on. Every piece of furniture was picked with that in mind—that it was just exhausted by the effort of being poor.” That made for a slow-going, meticulous selection process, and the designers experienced a setback when the actors found the barricade a little too inspiring. “Tom, in his amazing directorial way, whipped them into such anarchic frenzy that they couldn’t help themselves from ripping half the wall down,” Stewart says. “That’s why the cow is suddenly wandering around! The set decorator was crying in my lap as they were throwing the chickens in their cages at the barricade.” (Eventually, they found the chickens.) The film has many other delicate triumphs, too: a rendering of Paris before it was flattened by the Haussmann Plan, a delectable grotto in which Cosette rests like a bonbon in a box, and a shipyard so dramatic it seems biblical. But Stewart’s finest accomplishment may have been the most personal. “When we made the street,” she says, “all the craftsmen were there to build it and make the texture. They all have tattoos and they’re really terrible looking. They put on the soundtrack of ‘I Dreamed a Dream,’ and I swear, all 300 men started singing at the top of their voices. I never felt such a tingle in my life.” -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
alma
Auditioning
Posts: 416
|
Post by alma on Feb 2, 2013 1:14:20 GMT -5
Sue, Jo, Israruth, Anneter, Jamie and Bandala, you guys have perfectly put into words the frustration that a lot of us are feeling.
I must confess that when Anne was portrayed so prominently on the first trailer of Les Mis, I figured they were using the recent popularity of "I Dreamed a Dream" to catch the eye (or ear) of even those viewers who are not fans of musicals, and it might not be such a bad thing.
But it never moved forward from there!
On different talk shows and even newscasts, when they mention Oscars, they don't even mention Les Mis. Most of those people (it's obvious) have not watched all the movies, but the "harm" they do by just plugging the same-old same-old is considerable. They add to the hype repeating hearsay (or after glancing at a headline somewhere) and don't really have a reflective opinion.
I think that's a sign of the times, too: people trying to shift through a constant deluge of information (on any subject, not just recent films), without taking time to investigate, much less REFLECT on it (in the sense of careful or long consideration or thought). Too many simply repeat, going with the flow, not taking the time to form their own educated opinion.
Well, anyway. You guys said it better. This is just my two bits worth of philosophy.
Sounds to me like Russell is thinking along the same lines as we are (as fond as he is of Anne), and decided to take matters into his own hands as much as possible... hehehehe.
Alma
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,456
|
Post by jo on Feb 2, 2013 3:11:07 GMT -5
I know I said that I have stopped responding to IMDB posts - this one is not from the Les Miserables Page but on the general Movie Awards section. But I couldn't help it! www.imdb.com/board/bd0000005/nest/210233451Jo |
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,456
|
Post by jo on Feb 2, 2013 7:41:17 GMT -5
F-I-R-S-T T-I- M-E that I have seen a FYC ad for HUGH JACKMAN !!!!!  And that is the exact size of it on Variety |
|
|
|
Post by birchie on Feb 2, 2013 10:33:43 GMT -5
F-I-R-S-T T-I- M-E that I have seen a FYC ad for HUGH JACKMAN !!!!! And that is the exact size of it on Variety I know, isn't it infuriating? On the same page where I saw that one there was the best picture FYC which is the deathbed scene with Hugh & Anne and it's twice the size! Sue |
|
|
|
Post by birchie on Feb 2, 2013 10:50:29 GMT -5
I know I said that I have stopped responding to IMDB posts - this one is not from the Les Miserables Page but on the general Movie Awards section. But I couldn't help it! www.imdb.com/board/bd0000005/nest/210233451Jo Sorely tempted... I would have added that if Colm was 10 years younger he would have still been too old to play JVJ in a movie. He's never been my favorite even though the OBC CD was my first. Watching some of the YouTube JVJ clips even from the 80s really hasn't changed my opinion. I never see much in his performance. I guess people thought he was a great singer but I don't think his acting is anything to write home about. For me I'm not even a fan of his singing. Even when I've seen some YouTube clips of him in concert doing his Irish folk singer thing I wasn't impressed. I have watched several to try and see what people are so hyped about but I just don't really care for him. I understand that sentimentally he was the first JVJ and I appreciate him for that, but he could never be JVJ in a movie, even in the '80s, because he didn't/doesn't have the acting chops for it. From what I've read he was just a folk singer before Les Mis so I don't think he started out to be an actor anyway. I think he would be good now in older character roles such as the Bishop but I don't think he could have ever carried a movie. See, Jo...I'd be strung up by my keyboard if I posted that on IMDB! 8-) Sue |
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,456
|
Post by jo on Feb 2, 2013 11:01:23 GMT -5
Universal was really skimping on its Oscar promotion budget. They practically cut off part of Anne's head, but mercifully showed a full face for Hugh ;D  Jo |
|
Can't win with these things. 
