jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
|
Post by jo on Nov 15, 2013 10:26:43 GMT -5
If he does a classical play with Trevor Nunn, it will likely be staged in London. Just my gut feeling Jo
|
|
|
Post by mamaleh on Nov 15, 2013 11:08:43 GMT -5
Could be. While Nunn has staged numerous plays and musicals in New York, the last Shakespeare he did in NY was MUCH ADO in the '80s.
So if Hugh doesn't want a long separation (even for a limited run) from his family, then do you think the vehicle will be in NY and of the non-classical mold? Anybody's guess.
Ellen
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
|
Post by jo on Nov 19, 2013 18:52:29 GMT -5
Reposted from the Wolverine BluRay/DVD thread.
Hugh was in a live chat session on Twitter, re the release of The Wolverine BluRay/DVD
Btw, for a few minutes, the chat was on the current list of worldwide twitter trends, which proves Wolverine has a real global fanbase!
*Maybe he can work out for UNBOUND CAPTIVES to be greenlit? I think Madeleine Stowe may have to give up her dreams of helming it - let her original script be her way of being recognized for the merit of the project.
*Hugh mentions that he is looking at " a few projects " for the theatre - not just a couple. Also, he did not reply to a question re the status of Houdini.
Jo
|
|
|
Post by njr on Nov 19, 2013 19:32:38 GMT -5
*Hugh mentions that he is looking at " a few projects " for the theatre - not just a couple. Also, he did not reply to a question re the status of Houdini. Jo That was the question I asked! Nancy
|
|
|
Post by luzie on Nov 20, 2013 7:57:06 GMT -5
*Hugh mentions that he is looking at " a few projects " for the theatre - not just a couple. Also, he did not reply to a question re the status of Houdini. Jo That was the question I asked! Nancy It was a chat for The Wolverine DVD/Blu-Ray release - with some general questions too - and not for your "Houdini"! It doesn't help, if you ask him the same question every week. When he knows more and wants to tell it, he will say it, but not yet.
|
|
|
Post by mamaleh on Nov 20, 2013 8:51:07 GMT -5
Some might argue that Hugh has indeed does a "western," although it was technically a "northern" (AUSTRALIA). But I do hope he gets the opportunity to do a classic American-style western.
Ellen
|
|
|
Post by Jamie on Nov 20, 2013 8:59:07 GMT -5
Some might argue that Hugh has indeed does a "western," although it was technically a "northern" (AUSTRALIA). But I do hope he gets the opportunity to do a classic American-style western. Ellen I always felt Australia would have been better if it had concentrated on Drover's life as that period between WW I and WW II was so dramatic historically for Australia and it would be a "Western" that no one had ever seen unless you want to count something silly such as Quigley Down Under.
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
|
Post by jo on Nov 20, 2013 10:32:55 GMT -5
Do you remember the song that Elton John wrote about THE DROVER, which unfortunately was relegated to second spot ( and therefore did not qualify for an Academy Award nomination, as that is given to only the first song after the credits)? It focused on the history of The Drover, which could have been the more compelling story, instead of the screenplay that Baz decided to pursue. It could have covered the period from the first world war, when the young drover first went to war and lost his first wife...to the second world war when he found a new love again. The canvass of the Australian landscape could have served as the window to that part of the world, which included the story of the descendants of the early settlers and the original people of the land. It would have drawn a parallel to the history of the settling of the American west, with the early colonial settlers and the American Indians
I think Baz wanted to paint an overall landscape of a slice of history of Australia but he had played with too many subplots of the screenplay.
But many elements of the character of a western saga seemed to be in "Australia" - and maybe Hugh liked the genre for storytelling, with an accent on the action side. I think he wants the variety and he feels very much at home with action movies. I doubt that he would like to do indie-type dramas all the time.
Jo
|
|
|
Post by Jamie on Nov 20, 2013 13:03:56 GMT -5
Do you remember the song that Elton John wrote about THE DROVER, which unfortunately was relegated to second spot ( and therefore did not qualify for an Academy Award nomination, as that is given to only the first song after the credits)? It focused on the history of The Drover, which could have been the more compelling story, instead of the screenplay that Baz decided to pursue. It could have covered the period from the first world war, when the young drover first went to war and lost his first wife...to the second world war when he found a new love again. The canvass of the Australian landscape could have served as the window to that part of the world, which included the story of the descendants of the early settlers and the original people of the land. It would have drawn a parallel to the history of the settling of the American west, with the early colonial settlers and the American Indians I think Baz wanted to paint an overall landscape of a slice of history of Australia but he had played with too many subplots of the screenplay. But many elements of the character of a western saga seemed to be in "Australia" - and maybe Hugh liked the genre for storytelling, with an accent on the action side. I think he wants the variety and he feels very much at home with action movies. I doubt that he would like to do indie-type dramas all the time. Jo I once joked that Hugh could have done a sort of "Little Big Man" version of Drover from his birth to standing in the audience for the Centennial celebration while Peter Allen performed on stage. He could have played both the young to middle aged Drover, aged with make up to the 105 version and then became Peter for the big event. On the serious side, the aboriginal massacres, living through The Stolen Generation (depicted in Rabbit Proof Fence). The clash of cultures among the convict descendants, English aristocracy, aboriginal people, and the amalgam that finally became the Australian character with the Drover as the icon representing or being involved with them all would make one hell of a story. It's a shame that Australia didn't tell it.
|
|
|
Post by JH4HJ on Dec 9, 2013 22:22:41 GMT -5
Nothing new, really, but Hugh and Deb look great.
His good manners and patience are extraordinary. I could not spot any OZalots in this one...
Even if I had an iPad, which I don't, I'm quite sure I could not do this...
|
|
ruby
Auditioning
Posts: 345
|
Post by ruby on Dec 10, 2013 2:26:52 GMT -5
His good manners and patience are extraordinary. I could not spot any OZalots in this one...
[/quote]
Look again. Ozalot present.
|
|
|
Post by girlfromrio on Dec 19, 2013 14:44:21 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
|
Post by jo on Jan 21, 2014 18:43:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by njr on Jan 21, 2014 19:25:06 GMT -5
They quoted him wrong--what he said was "balls hanging from your neck". Kate Winslett didn't have them on her neck! Nancy
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
|
Post by jo on Feb 18, 2014 18:58:33 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
|
Post by jo on Feb 18, 2014 19:19:17 GMT -5
Interesting how he thinks PHANTOM OF THE OPERA is the "biggest' musical of all time ( probably true as it is still running on Broadway, continuously!) but no one really saw the movie. Had Hugh been able to fit that in into his schedule ( it was going to start filming, alongside his commitment to THE BOY FROM OZ)...and had Joel Schumacher been replaced by someone more visionary like Tom Hooper -- would the movie have been a greater success? Hugh being the only likely choice for Les Miserables was a contributing factor in the commercial success of Les Miserables as a film adaptation. Had Hugh not been on Broadway in TBFO, he would not likely have gained the prominence as a musical theatre actor which led to his casting as Valjean. Perhaps PHANTOM would have been better received with Hugh as the Phantom because he does have a much greater screen presence and true musical theatre singing chops compared to Gerard Butler, and a much larger fanbase ( his earlier movies - XMEN and KATE AND LEOPOLD appealed to a wider fanbase).
Maybe Hugh also wanted to do the Phantom role ( of which he did have a taste of in SNL, no matter that it was a parody) as much as he did want the Valjean role. The Phantom was the central character in the entire musical ( and with such glorious arias as MUSIC OF THE NIGHT, ANGEL OF MUSIC, and PHANTOM OF THE OPERA), with impressive acting requirements, whereas Valjean had to take a backseat in a big part of the second act of Les Miserables.
Also, an earlier team-up with Anne Hathaway ( who was allegedly offered the role of Christine) would have increased the dramatic appeal of the movie adaptation.
What could have been smiley-signs002
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
|
Post by jo on Feb 18, 2014 22:30:28 GMT -5
It must have been very difficult to film LES MISERABLES, with the nature of filming being fractured, as the characters had to sing both songs and dialogs. One must have to concentrate very well to make sure the dramatic goals are met, while starting, stopping, and starting all over again. We have heard that Hugh had to sing BRING HIM HOME 14 times, Russell had to sing STARS 28 times, Eddie had to sing EMPTY CHAIRS AT EMPTY TABLES some 20 or so times and Anne had to sing I DREAMED A DREAM much less the number of the others but still more than just once or twice. To be able to put in the right dramatic chops while singing the songs/dialogs...and to be interrupted and asked to sing it again and again -- that must have been really difficult.
Live singing was the only to make it more realistic. One must watch that the storytelling and character portraits are kept within artistic boundaries, while making sure the notes are within the composer's intent.
No wonder Hugh calls it the role of a lifetime. The effort he invested into the role and the results really deserved the Oscar! He was not mimicking anyone ( not even Colm in his original staging of the musical) nor was the nature of filmmaking easy to deliver the long monologues/soliloquys or the even the long drawn-out scenes ( with its changes in moods) such as the finale. I wonder if politics and sentimentality had not been factors in the Oscar-voting, if Hugh's Valjean would have been the triumphant winner!
I remember what Russell had to say when he said he voted for Hugh Jackman for Oscar Best Actor -- he said it was due to "the character arc and the degree of difficulty". Russell must have been very aware and awed by what Hugh had to do to give justice to the role!
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
|
Post by jo on Feb 18, 2014 22:49:43 GMT -5
This year and the next, there will be film adaptations of INTO THE WOODS, JERSEY BOYS, ANNIE. Many actors who may or may not have been in musical theatre have been encouraged to try their hand in this film genre.
But Hugh is going to be a step forward again -- he is aiming to produce and star in a brand new musical, designed for the movies. It is the musical biopic of P.T.Barnum in THE GREATEST SHOWMAN ON EARTH.
I wonder if Hugh has ever thought of doing a film adaptation of THE BOY FROM OZ?
Jo
|
|
|
Post by birchie on Feb 18, 2014 23:16:58 GMT -5
Nice Canadiens interview. Too bad it wasn't on video! As for Wolverine Canuck movie tie-ins, the biggest one for me was in X-Men Origins: Wolverine. I didn't really notice it when I saw it in the theater but the first time I saw it at home I was watching the BluRay with my son and the scene when he's taken in by the Canadian farm couple and he joins them for dinner blew my mind. I started yelling OMG they're eating meat pie!! So I went back a few frames & sure enough there in the middle of the table is a big beautiful meat pie (Tourtière). Our family makes them for holiday dinners and I love it so much that I sometimes make one just for myself, even without a holiday! So there's a bit of movie trivia you can use...Wolverine eats French meat pie Sue
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
|
Post by jo on May 2, 2014 8:20:56 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
|
Post by jo on May 2, 2014 8:34:39 GMT -5
I enjoyed reading this part of the above interview the most! He is not driving himself to find awards-bait roles but rather challenging himself to seek variety (as in "the spice of life!") in the work that he does! It must be the consummate actor in him! That is the drama of his career aspirations!
I have a feeling that tackling a villainy role like BLACKBEARD and going to Broadway with a "reflective play" such as THE RIVER, instead of a showy engagement, are just part of the new worlds he wants to conquer.
I am very excited about what comes next in the next few years. I wonder if the challenges will ever include a classical play before Trevor Nunn retires?
Jo
|
|
|
Post by mamaleh on May 2, 2014 8:35:54 GMT -5
I guess the kids' private schools allow parents to join them for lunch? I never saw that happen at P.S. 41 on Staten Island. Ellen
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
|
Post by jo on May 2, 2014 8:41:40 GMT -5
Only if the parent is one Hugh Jackman - jk Jo
|
|
|
Post by chessie on May 2, 2014 13:56:05 GMT -5
From time to time a parent would join their child for lunch at the school where I taught. After sampling the food and experiencing the pandemonium in the cafeteria, they seldom returned for a second visit. I have a feeling that the atmosphere might be a bit different in the schools Hugh's kids attend. I think the interview confirms the fact that Hugh's choices are based on what he finds personally satisfying and challenging. It's why his career has been so diverse. Carol
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,434
|
Post by jo on May 14, 2014 7:50:31 GMT -5
This is from the media tour for DAYS OF FUTURE PAST, but the questions were more personal and not really about the movie itself -- english.cri.cn/6666/2014/05/14/102s826484.htmHe would love to go back to ancient Greece! It seems he wants to learn more about philosophy from the original thinkers...and he does love the theatre ( can you imagine him emoting on one of the ancient ampitheatres?) Jo
|
|