|
Post by birchie on Aug 27, 2013 22:00:01 GMT -5
Keller Dover was a Bible-quoting family man -- so it is not surprising to see the crucifix necklace, as an affirmation of his faith. Jo I guess I was surprised because I think of it as very Catholic and wasn't sure how they were going to play up the religious aspect of the character. I guess if they show the setting as the Boston area that would make sense. Haven't seen anything in the trailers to get a sense of place yet even though the script is set in the Boston area. Sue
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,436
|
Post by jo on Aug 27, 2013 22:39:35 GMT -5
On the other hand --
I have seen one or two similar reactions like this :
Although this one is a bit more brave --
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,436
|
Post by jo on Aug 28, 2013 3:56:53 GMT -5
IMDB is now reporting that the screen time of PRISONERS has been changed to a much shorter length than the originally-reported 146 minutes --
It must have been edited or incorrectly reported because 146 min ( 2 hours and 26 minutes) seemed quite long for a fast-paced storyline ( based on the script). The new screen time would be 1 hr and 47 minutes . But Box Office Mojo still reports an " R" rating.
Jo
|
|
|
Post by mamaleh on Aug 28, 2013 6:48:12 GMT -5
1:46 or 7 must have been misreported as 146 minutes.
Ellen
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,436
|
Post by jo on Aug 29, 2013 1:20:20 GMT -5
The positive buzz is coming The twitter message comes from a NYC screenwriter who sends a message to David Poland, a film observer! Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,436
|
Post by jo on Aug 29, 2013 1:20:50 GMT -5
The positive buzz is coming The twitter message comes from a respected screenwriter, Larry Gross, who sends a message to David Poland, a film observer! Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,436
|
Post by jo on Aug 29, 2013 1:29:43 GMT -5
With the mention of ZODIAC and NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN ( their type of movies), the snobbish netizens of IMDB's MOVIE AWARDS BOARD have started chattering about this one, too -- www.imdb.com/board/bd0000005/nest/218981795?p=1Herd mentality - LOL! Of course, there are the usual Hugh skeptics - always that he is good only as Wolverine smiley-rolleyes010 Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,436
|
Post by jo on Aug 29, 2013 10:08:42 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,436
|
Post by jo on Aug 29, 2013 16:20:14 GMT -5
It looks like someone has seen an advance screening --
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,436
|
Post by jo on Aug 29, 2013 19:34:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by carouselkathy on Aug 29, 2013 19:46:40 GMT -5
For PRISONERS to be mentioned along with 12 YEARS A SLAVE is a very good indication that there's good buzz in the festival circuit.
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,436
|
Post by jo on Aug 30, 2013 5:49:57 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,436
|
Post by jo on Aug 30, 2013 20:01:26 GMT -5
It's even screening at practically the same time as 12 Years a Slave - one cannot see both because of the screening schedule! Kris Tapley did chose to see PRISONERS.
If Prisoners gets the stronger buzz (not expected), that could really get the movie going!
I didn't know that Paul Dano is also in 12 YEARS A SLAVE.
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,436
|
Post by jo on Aug 30, 2013 20:59:59 GMT -5
Behind the scenes, with Jake and Denis Villeneuve -- Too bad, only Denis and the producers turned up at Telluride, while 12 YEARS A SLAVE had the whole contingent at the first showing of their movie, including Brad Pitt! Jo
|
|
|
Post by Jamie on Aug 30, 2013 21:18:52 GMT -5
First official review from Variety tweeter
Scott Foundas @foundasonfilm 7m My one-word review of Denis Villeneuve's PRISONERS: Wow. My 1000-word review: variety.com/2013/film/reviews/prisoners-review-telluride-1200593140/
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,436
|
Post by jo on Aug 30, 2013 21:21:34 GMT -5
The reviews are coming in!
Maybe we should set up a new thread?
Jamie - I hope you don't mind if the Variety review is reproduced in that section? Thanks!
Jo
|
|
|
Post by mamaleh on Aug 30, 2013 21:21:55 GMT -5
Love that "career best" and "Jackman has never been better" verbiage. Stellar review for all involved. Here we go again!
Ellen
|
|
|
Post by Jamie on Aug 30, 2013 21:28:25 GMT -5
Gotta Luv It !!!!! Jackman has simply never been better than as this true believer forced to question his beliefs. Effortlessly, the Australian actor projects a solid, rugged Americanness, the acme of a man whose home is his castle and who sees himself as his family’s protector. It is a performance void of vanity or the desire to be loved by the audience, and moment to moment it is exhilarating to watch.
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,436
|
Post by jo on Aug 30, 2013 21:40:38 GMT -5
The people on IMDB are saying they have just been served a warm plate of crow The movie is actually about 2 1/2 hours! It might almost be too hard to sit through this kind of edge-of-the-seat stuff for that long! One question raised in the reviews - will people want to see such gritty stuff, given the timeliness of the subject and esp if one has young children. Kris Tapley was asked by someone who has a 6-year old if he should watch the movie...and Kris gave a categorical YES! Will post the official reviews ( with spoilers) on the other thread. I have a feeling that the people from Variety and The Hollywood Reporter were part of the advance LA screening but their reviews were embargoed until after Telluride. Maybe WB has read those reviews and that was why they had no problems about the practical overlap with 12 YEARS A SLAVE screening at Telluride? Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,436
|
Post by jo on Aug 31, 2013 1:38:08 GMT -5
I am reposting this from the review thread - a report on how the audience reacted to the extreme violence depicted on the movie --
This is an "R" rated movie, maybe because of the violence shown.
*Do you shy away from movies with such a subject treatment? Can you recommend the movie to others -- maybe with a caution included? Ironically, it is much easier to see the carnage of war than to see individual stories into whose lives violence happens.
*If you are the parents of young children or have young relatives, can you stand to see such a story? I wonder if the thought crossed Hugh's mind, as he himself has two kids?
*Some of us who have read the script have an idea of what type of violence is depicted -- although maybe seeing it actually shown on screen is a different kind of story. Much more stomach-wrenching or the type of scenes that one turns one's head away from. Although when one watches some of the crime procedural dramas on TV, there is already so much gore and even violence shown, no matter how briefly.
*What about terrorism scenes which are no longer edited and displayed on CNN and other newscasts?
*Ironically, Wolverine movies also depict a lot gore and violence ( even if sometimes they are simply implied, such as when the show of blood is omitted) but there is a lot of carnage -- does this bother us? Or because it is a fantasy story, comic book fare -- we seem to ignore the issue when he assess the movie.
*Do you think there is too much realism depicted in movies and television today?
Just some food for thought.
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,436
|
Post by jo on Aug 31, 2013 18:12:02 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,436
|
Post by jo on Aug 31, 2013 19:07:10 GMT -5
Another one (Scott Feinberg) which casts doubts on the viability as an Oscar contender -- www.hollywoodreporter.com/race/telluride-prisoners-is-well-made-618836Why this early casting doubts on the Oscar viability of PRISONERS?? Are people ( other contenders and the bloggers/film commentarists) afraid that its spectacular reception at Telluride may create a juggernaut effect? Or is this part of the Warner Bros strategy -- put the film and its actors in an "underdog" capacity - so good but why give it to this brash newcomer ( new director to Hollywood, first script written by the screenwriter, Wolverine and the Prince of Persia) Ha - it just might work! But I think it cannot be denied that human nature is drawn to something controversial, esp if it is reflection of contemporary social issues and if the creative talent is too good not to acknowledge! Besides I am not sure I trust Feinberg -- he is probably eating some crow now -- he placed the movie and its actors as longshots and now it may have way exceeded his forecasts <oops> Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,436
|
Post by jo on Aug 31, 2013 21:59:14 GMT -5
Anne Thopmson labels PRISONERS as an OSCAR Hopeful, in the same breath as 12 YEARS A SLAVE "But will audiences take to this dark and disturbing crime story when it hits theaters September 20 via Warner Bros.?Why are the film observers all of a sudden wary of the film's acceptability to general audiences? Even if it is only a movie for a niche market, should that detract from its award-worthiness? I wonder why this issue is being raised by many film bloggers?? Hmmm.... Jo
|
|
|
Post by mamaleh on Aug 31, 2013 22:59:20 GMT -5
How many people saw THE READER, which won Kate Winslet an Oscar? As Hugh joked in his Oscars opening number, everybody was lining up to see IRON MAN a second time, not the heavy drama. Yet, Hugh's chances at a nom for AUSTRALIA were reportedly dashed when the movie didn't do as well as expected in the US.
How a movie fares financially should not have anything to do with its artistic success.
Ellen
|
|
|
Post by carouselkathy on Aug 31, 2013 23:12:09 GMT -5
So true, Ellen! By the way, i saw THE READER.
|
|