jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 26, 2016 17:59:15 GMT -5
Have they started filming yet? Or soon? Where did he catch his big fish? Around New Orleans? His facial hair has not yet been styled for the Wolverine look - so, maybe he is still in pre-prod right before filming starts?
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 26, 2016 22:14:58 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 27, 2016 4:33:27 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 27, 2016 17:22:07 GMT -5
Hugh and the staff were probably watching the Jimmy Fallon Show, while he was being fitted for makeup and hairstyle for WOLVERINE 3 --
Somehow, he manages to look slightly different in each of the XMEN movies ( best look for me was ORIGINS:WOLVERINE).
Btw, re the Bana impersonation on the Fallon show -- I read somewhere that Eric used to do stand-up comedy and was a comedian on an Australian TV series before he turned to acting.
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 27, 2016 17:40:22 GMT -5
Many speculations arise after the surprise appearance of the three claws on a bloodied hand in the APOCALYPSE final trailer, especially after Bryan Singer added his clarifications or actually deepened the enigma. But this speculation seemed to be quite in the opposite direction -- www.digitalspy.com/movies/x-men/news/a792161/wolverines-x-men-apocalypse-cameo-new-direction-bryan-singer/It didn't seem that Bryan meant to imply that there will be a change in the direction for the character of Logan/Wolverine. That would tie the hands of WOLVERINE 3, which is literally starting filming now...unless James Mangold and the screenwriter and Hugh, of course, of WOLVERINE 3 have had deep discussions with Bryan Singer to let Singer know what the third spinoff movie has in store for Wolverine. It seems though that Bryan may be referring more to the direction of the franchise ( specifically to the 6 films in the XMen team movies franchise that he alluded to). There was a more recent rumor that Bryan might do a final project for the franchise and that filming in Montreal might be slated in the near future -- but it is still just a rumor. But he might be setting up the direction of that last effort with this sequence in APOCALYPSE involving Wolverine! Unless he wanted to completely erase memories of ORIGINS and THE WOLVERINE?!! But why would he want to do that??!! It is doubtful that he would want to fold in all interpretations of XMEN characters who get spinoffs ( Wolverine, Deadpool, and maybe Gambit)? Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 27, 2016 19:04:14 GMT -5
This site tries to think through all the possible implications or actually speculations re the appearance of the Clawed Hand in APOCALYPSE -- whatculture.com/film-tv/10-theories-how-wolverine-can-fit-into-xmen-apocalypseInteresting that one of the speculations is that Singer wants to basically re-draw XMEN LAST STAND and ORIGINS:WOLVERINE! Hey, what will you do with the $ 833 Million that the two films put into the FOX coffers? Looking back -- I doubt that Bryan Singer ever thought that when he accepted the filmization job of the first XMEN movie in 1999, that 17 years later, he would still be going back to the drawing board to remap the strategy of how the XMEN team have become the first credible superheroes on screen
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 27, 2016 19:34:35 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 27, 2016 20:24:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mamaleh on Apr 27, 2016 23:32:28 GMT -5
Hugh's friends with Ricky Gervais, isn't he? Merchant has long worked with Gervais. Maybe the idea for Merchant's casting thusly sprang?
Ellen
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 28, 2016 0:04:01 GMT -5
The choices are beginning to look very interesting! And if you can speculate on the roles they might play -- definitely interesting! *What will be the theme of this movie, especially that it is Hugh's farewell stint as Wolverine? *Are they taking some leads from DEADPOOL, not just for its R rating for violence but also for a bit of naughtiness? *The characters as described so far are " main villain", "mad scientist" and presumably " the comic relief". Heavens! *What a change from the age brackets of the mutants from APOCALYPSE *Some still speculate that there will be similarities to OLD MAN LOGAN ( which seemed very odd per se to me, if they use the uber-fantasies and strange characters for a film adaptation). But fans note possible similarities -- esp re the flight of certain characters because they were being pursued ( the news from Juarez, Mexico that filming in an old factory which will be used to hide the fugitives seems to validate that). *And there have been broad hints about the appearance of X-23, the female clone of Wolverine ( although there is also the rumor that she is his daughter). *And I am really anxious to see the WOLVERINE look for this movie since it implies a time into the future! The fanboys are stumped trying to guess what this is all about ( " At least with THE WOLVERINE, we knew about Yukio, Mariko, and Silver Samurai and where it happens ") Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 28, 2016 0:17:49 GMT -5
Hey, another coincidence -- except for Boyd Holbrook, so far the announced cast carry British passports including our favorite Aussie who says he also uses his UK passport ** when entering the UK Patrick Stewart Richard Grant Stephen Merchant Hugh Jackman** If Ricky Gervais joins the cast even in a small capacity -- this is going to turn everything upside down
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 28, 2016 4:33:20 GMT -5
It looks like Hugh is in New Orleans now ( where the first phase of filming for WOLVERINE 3 is slated). And Deb joined him maybe initially ?
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 28, 2016 16:09:28 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 28, 2016 16:57:43 GMT -5
The original article from THE WRAP -- www.thewrap.com/20th-century-fox-pulls-out-of-comic-con-hall-h-presentation-exclusive/I wonder if this is a firm decision because the Fox rep declined to comment? Maybe it is under negotiations? If they do not make a Hall H presentation, there is no chance to exhibit scenes from WOLVERINE 3 after 2016 because the film is being released early next year (March 3, 2017). Hugh did make that farewell-to-Wolverine presentation at 2015 ComicCon.
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 28, 2016 17:50:13 GMT -5
Hugh has hinted about using some ideas from OLD MAN LOGAN for WOLVERINE 3.
A comicbook geek has put together on YouTube the story of OLM based on the comic book series ---
I wonder how much, if any, of the themes and characters in OLM will be adapted for WOLVERINE 3??
Obviously, they will likely do away with references to Marvel characters not belonging to the XMEN franchise ( such as the reference to Spiderman, to Captain America, to Iron Man, to Thor, etc).
And there are characters from fantasy land which may not fit into a cinematic adaptation on the story of Logan ( based on ORIGINS and THE WOLVERINE) - which are unlikely to be featured?
But the hard violence will likely be adapted partly or in full!
But, as we do not know yet what the theme of WOLVERINE 3 would be, we could be completely wrong about the movie being inspired by the story of OLD MAN LOGAN.
Hmmm ... Hugh with white hair ?? Probably still as handsome and as manly!
Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 28, 2016 23:13:38 GMT -5
It looks like Stephen Merchant is trying Blackbeard's hairstyle -- http://instagram.com/p/BEueg2sPfXe If you check out the OldManLogan video clip, there is a character there which seemed to have inspired Stephen's hair-shedding? Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 28, 2016 23:24:16 GMT -5
When fanboys or any XMEN fan ( comics or movies) get excited, their imagination can really extend to the wildest fantasies ...or wishlists www.slashgear.com/5-reasons-wolverine-3-will-kick-rump-with-a-capital-r-rating-28438149/Hey, they made a similar observation that I have posted earlier -- that the bony structure of Hugh's hand ( left in particular - knuckles, specifically) gives away that it seems to be Hugh's hand that was used for the Wolverine bloodied hand with the three claws in the APOCALYPSE trailer! Snikt Their comparison --
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 28, 2016 23:41:14 GMT -5
This was what I had posted earlier ( on the APOCALYPSE thread) -- A lot of controversy surrounding the owner of this left hand with a set of claws ( partly reinforced by Bryan Singer's enigmatic comments) -- Is it Hugh's or a new actor playing Wolverine? In real life, notice the same bone protrusion on Hugh's left hand similar to the image from the trailer. Some have commented that the forearm is too thin ( and not veiny enough...and not muscly enough). When Hugh is not in Wolverine mode, here is a sample of his long forearms ( they look a bit thin only because his forearm is quite long) -- In this photo, I think you can see a little of the bone protrusion in the left hand, and the long forearm.
|
|
|
Post by hughmanity on Apr 29, 2016 19:14:07 GMT -5
The facial hair may not yet be Wolverine's, but the body certainly is! This was taken at a gym in New Orleans. http://instagr.am/p/BEzAYVOOQH8 Didn't expect the picture to show up twice, but don't think anyone will complain...
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 29, 2016 19:22:25 GMT -5
Thanks! If they are basing the story on OldManLogan ( which presumably takes place way into the future) -- was it necessary to show a physique that is more of the current time ( hey, I am trying to save Hugh more grief at the gym ) -- or maybe the 20-50 years piled on did not change too much for the physical attributes of Logan ( except for the greying of the hair)? I guess one reason why fanboys adore Wolverine is because his healing/regenerative powers allow him to be fighting-fit all the time, no matter how he advances in age I have a feeling that they might actually use a full beard at some point...then maybe trimming it to mutton-chops later? He has already tweeted being in MAKEUP the other day -- would have been nice if he also shared the final decision Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on Apr 30, 2016 3:08:41 GMT -5
Home for the weekend from pre-prod at New Orleans? Riding on the company ( FOX) plane? Otherwise, he would likely be taking this photo not from the back of the engines Jo
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on May 1, 2016 8:18:57 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on May 1, 2016 10:59:06 GMT -5
I am not sure about the particular event, but it seems there was a presentation of FOX'S 2016 slate plus some to a select audience -- www.eurweb.com/2016/04/fox-gives-first-look-at-fierce-films-for-2016/It seems they have already filmed some scenes for WOLVERINE UNTITLED for purposes of he presentation ?? It is surprising that no word has leaked on this. At the Cinemacon in Las Vegas early this month, the FOX presentation to theatre exhibitors included only a page showing the title of WOLVERINE UNTITLED, but no scenes were said to have been shown. Hmmm... Jo
|
|
|
Post by hughmanity on May 1, 2016 18:44:43 GMT -5
|
|
jo
Ensemble
Posts: 46,460
|
Post by jo on May 1, 2016 19:28:19 GMT -5
Thanks. I also read that but the analysis by Flickering Myth was not substantive at all. Nothing to indicate that what they said in their feature title is supported by the so-called analysis inside. Perhaps they should have called attention to the following -- *SDCC is becoming super-expensive for studios. The move by SDCC to charge for pay-per-view will benefit them and not the studios. *Is SDCC peaking? There are already other conventions all over the place...will Fox have to keep replicating the exclusives given to SDCC? *Fox was the first major studio that was hurt by online piracy of one of its superhero movies -- remember how ORIGINS:WOLVERINE was leaked even before the film opened. Since then, they have been actively campaigning ( and restrategizing) on how to combat it. Fox Chairman Jim Gianopulos ( who used to head Distribution before he became sole Chairman) is actively at the forefront of the anti-piracy campaign. *True, the first glimpse of DEADPOOL via SDCC made fanboys sit up and notice -- but it was the free-wheeling, inventive promotional campaign which followed which made the fans curiouser and curiouser and curiouser! Plus they did deliver on a free-wheeling R-rated stuff! But that is because that is the essence of the character of The Merc with a Mouth! *But most of all -- why spend unnecessarily when the new information age allows FREE advertising via the internet. One does not have to go to SDCC to show the first glimpse of scenes. It can even be shown on entertainment sites as set visits, followed by the release of a first trailer on the internet! Besides there are only around 6,000 who can be contained in Hall H at SDCC. Releasing the first glimpses on mainstream media ( print and TV) and releasing the first trailer online -- that would be the most effective way to initiate and keep fanboy frenzy going! Why not reallocate the funds to more aggressive advertising on TV and maybe other main media? Why not promote the superhero films with more local premieres and encouraging the stars to promote the movie as widely as they can ( Look at EDDIE THE EAGLE - it is only a small, low-budget film -- yet Hugh must have accumulated so much mileage from all the various trips in the USA and overseas that he can probably now get a free ticket to the moon from his mileage program ) I am sure the decision of FOX was not a whimsical decision of the moment. They are looking at the environment and learning their lessons. One other point, FOX is now under the stewardship of the younger Murdochs, both experienced in media management, and they may be bringing in some welcome winds of change. They will not necessarily cut down costs -- maybe they are opting to spend it better, or even better - create new ways to earn revenue ( the essence of business!)! Maybe even allow them to re-allocate the funds to other worthy projects ? Jo
|
|